2008-10-15, 17:50 | Link #741 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
|
I think I first encountered the term in GSpot: The width to height ratio of the storage frame (pixel count as internally stored).
Reading a little on sample aspect ratio I see now that SAR shouldn't be used as an abrevation for storage/source ar but since that's cleared up I'm sure you know the concept nonetheless. I got the idea of 1280x720 encoded pixels (storage ar) which happen to be nonsquare (sample/pixel ar) so the picture is displayed as 1408:720 (dar). Edit 1: Probably after reading that post at videohelp.com Spoiler:
edit 2: Ok, you do know the concept since your equation is the same as mine. What I called storage AR is simply width and height in your post. edit 3: That's the worst thing about being noob and not knowing the proper terminology. People don't even understand your questions (to tell you you're asking the wrong ones) So I understand stripping my .h264 of evil pixel ar settings via remuxing is correct. Last edited by guest0815; 2008-10-15 at 21:23. |
2008-10-15, 21:53 | Link #742 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
|
Huh? Well, there can't be much wrong with removing PAR info that distort a 16/9 source via mp4box' par=none, can there? So far you guys made it sound like, in this case, PAR is just like another DAR header. This seems to be supported by the fact that for mp4box there isn't even an option to set a DAR. What mkvmerge does with the custom DAR mp4box achieves through the custom PAR.
But I shouldn't speculate, there are probably lots of people on this forum that know about this pretty well. Only thing that initially made me pause for a moment was that the PAR info is written directly into the video track. |
2008-10-15, 22:45 | Link #743 | ||
Part 8
IT Support
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
2008-10-15, 23:24 | Link #744 | |
Senior Member
Author
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Virginia Tech
|
Quote:
And I've been using AVSP. I haven't really been encoding for too long, only like 4 months, and it's not like I'm actively learning filtering or anything. Just doing a bit in my free time, nowadays mainly just for fun (since I suck too much to actually work anywhere encoding. XD)
__________________
|
|
2008-10-16, 07:41 | Link #746 | ||
Excessively jovial fellow
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: ISDB-T
Age: 37
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
|
||
2008-11-15, 17:28 | Link #747 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
|
question about editions in mkv files
Do anyone know if it's possible to link a specific .ass file to an edition? So that when you select a different edition, you also switch subtitles file.
Also, is it possible to have an edition that disables subtitles? |
2008-11-16, 06:08 | Link #749 |
Excessively jovial fellow
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: ISDB-T
Age: 37
|
Yes, trackset/tracksetex will do what you want.
1) Define two or more editions, let's say the have the edition UID's 4200 and 4201 2) Write a tags xml document like so: Code:
<!-- <!DOCTYPE Tags SYSTEM "matroskatags.dtd"> --> <Tags> <Tag> <Simple> <Name>TRACKSETEX</Name> <String>4200 . #0 x eng</String> </Simple> <Simple> <Name>TRACKSETEX</Name> <String>4201 . #1 #0 jpn</String> </Simple> </Tag> </Tags> Code:
EditionUID #VideoTrackNumber #AudioTrackNumber #SubtitleTrackNumber [optional three-letter language code] 3) Mux MKV with chapters/editions XML and tags XML. Do note that this is a Haali-specific feature; the tracksets do nothing with other splitters.
__________________
|
2008-11-21, 15:46 | Link #750 |
Senior Member
Author
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Virginia Tech
|
Is there any kind of a difference between a .ts and a .m2ts file? They both read as a MPEG-2 transport stream, but I can't really tell if there's and kind of difference between them at all.
__________________
|
2008-11-21, 16:11 | Link #751 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2006
|
.ts are seen mostly (or exclusively?) for broadcasts, and use 188-byte packets (im not going to explain this here. .m2ts are used on BDs (etc?) and have an extra 4 byte timecode in each packet, making 'em 192-bytes. This allows them to write packets out of order etc...
|
2008-11-21, 17:04 | Link #752 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
|
Well, my problem is, that I usually use VirtualDubMod to encode xvid, but my friend's little older computer doesn't play it, no matter what codec pack she use. Even if it can play, it's because I encoded the file twice, so the quality is a mess. I tried to encode Divx too, but I probably didn't set the export properities the right way, because the result wasn't satisfying. Has anyone tips?
|
2008-11-22, 04:19 | Link #753 |
名前は?
Scanlator
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Washington
Age: 35
|
I have a comment which relates to creating fansubs.
Please, try your best to avoid doing this. I almost fell out of my chair and hit my head when I saw this. |
2008-11-22, 06:09 | Link #754 | |
x264 Developer
Join Date: Feb 2008
|
Quote:
|
|
2008-11-22, 10:32 | Link #755 | |
Hi
Fansubber
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
2008-11-22, 11:12 | Link #758 | |
Hi
Fansubber
|
Quote:
Well, guessing is not enough for me so maybe it's just me. @martino: as long as it is softsubbed and doesn't overlap anything important...
__________________
|
|
2008-11-22, 13:55 | Link #759 |
Aegisub dev
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Age: 39
|
I think the only thing possibly wrong with that sample is the superfluous text around the actual translation. Instead of "Note: There is ..." it could have been shortened to one of these without making it any harder to understand:
Cake: Happy Birthday "Happy Birthday" And yes probably do away with the white box.
__________________
|
|
|