2011-03-14, 18:37 | Link #962 |
Senior Member
Artist
Join Date: Mar 2010
|
very, all of these pictures of the carnage just breaks my heart. I feel like I need to help in some way like go there and do something, but i fell so helpless at my age.. I would love to volunteer for the red cross and go there to help in kind of way
|
2011-03-14, 18:39 | Link #963 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Suburban DC
|
If I heard correctly some of the commentators are a little annoyed by the information at the TEPCO press conference. I think I heard an official say "This is not a place to express opinions, this a place to get the facts" or something like that.
|
2011-03-14, 18:44 | Link #965 | |
Also a Lolicon
Join Date: Apr 2010
|
Quote:
btw, Containment Vessel? Has the containment building failed or the reactor vessel? Source? |
|
2011-03-14, 18:49 | Link #967 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Moscow, RU
Age: 35
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
2011-03-14, 18:52 | Link #968 | |
Asuki-tan Kairin ↓
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Fürth (GER)
Age: 43
|
Quote:
But since we are talking about a BWR, that means the suppression pool is a structural part of the inner cooling cycle... I say you are half way right. It means there is even more radiation coming from the inner coolant now, since more of it is exposed (more so than in the venting incidents) to the outer containment (which was opened to release the oxyhydrogen ( I read this somewhere in this thread) that made the outer containment of block 1 and 3 go bust). Whats more concerning to me, they cannot use the inner cooling cycle now. I hope they already injected the boron in the core of reactor of block 2 (as they did in block 1 and 3). Then they can just close the valves from and to the reactor.
__________________
|
|
2011-03-14, 18:53 | Link #970 | |||
Also a Lolicon
Join Date: Apr 2010
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
2. No Massive Radiation Leakage. Reactors are still intact. Though, the cooling loop inside the reactor seems dead, so its harder to keep things under control probably. |
|||
2011-03-14, 18:56 | Link #972 |
Gamilas Falls
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Republic of California
Age: 46
|
Sounds like a case of human error caused by them focusing on the other two reactors and neglecting the remaining one.
However that is just an impression I am getting at this time. I have some faith in the design of they reactor keeping the worst of it from spreading for any long term ratiation poisoning of the region.
__________________
|
2011-03-14, 19:01 | Link #973 | ||
Gregory House
IT Support
|
Quote:
Quote:
PS: I am not an anti-nuke bigot. I was actually TRUSTING the lobbying machine, even though I know they say what they say because they are invested in the matter. But the way things have developed has changed my opinion deeply.
__________________
|
||
2011-03-14, 19:04 | Link #974 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
|
Quote:
http://live.nicovideo.jp/ |
|
2011-03-14, 19:04 | Link #975 | ||
Also a Lolicon
Join Date: Apr 2010
|
Not sure what you are asking, so I'll answer both most likely questions
Quote:
My source prior was random forum threads and emails with friends in Japan Quote:
|
||
2011-03-14, 19:10 | Link #977 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Moscow, RU
Age: 35
|
Quote:
/off to bed Before I'm off: Quote:
__________________
|
||
2011-03-14, 19:16 | Link #978 | |
Asuki-tan Kairin ↓
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Fürth (GER)
Age: 43
|
Quote:
I am still trying to figure something out though. In german BWRs there are catalytic recombinators that (in theory) recombine the H2 with the O2 in a catalytic way, should both agents be inside the system. Now I wonder if these were not installed in Fukushima, or if they simply failed. In that case I can deduct for the german BWRs that the catalytic recombinators are just a safety gimmick that most likely has no real purpose (doesn't really add to the safety).
__________________
|
|
2011-03-14, 19:23 | Link #979 | ||
Also a Lolicon
Join Date: Apr 2010
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
Tags |
disaster, japan, tsunami |
|
|