2010-07-06, 17:22 | Link #2963 | |
Back off, I'm a scientist
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: In a badly written story.
|
Quote:
What if Lambda is actually out to depower Bern, rather than just trap her in a stalemate or win? Certainity does not win against miracles because these powers are exactly opposed, and it becomes an endurance contest. But if Lambda can get Bern to engross herself in somebody else's story and bet on something which is not simply unlikely, but explicitly logically impossible, she can trap her in a paradox. After all, no miracle will determine the behaviour of a barber who shaves and doesn't shave himself. EDIT: In fact, treat this paradox as a loop, and you get precisely what eternal magic would probably be able to accomplish.
__________________
|
|
2010-07-06, 17:22 | Link #2964 | |
It's Hammertime!
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Italy (Neaples)
|
Quote:
|
|
2010-07-06, 17:25 | Link #2965 | |
別にいいけど
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: forever lost inside a logic error
|
Quote:
Then in EP5 I don't know if it can be said that she has done something against Battler, but with all that stuff she allowed Bern to do, indirectly she did. It's not like Lambda couldn't limit Erika's power if she wanted.
__________________
|
|
2010-07-06, 17:46 | Link #2966 | |
Dea ex Kakera
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Sea of Fragments
|
Quote:
I also think that, given that Ange was ostensibly Bern's piece, the fact that Lambda was even in a position to bribe her at all is quite interesting. Based on her reactions at the end, I always thought she'd expected him to smash Bern's theory much earlier in the proceedings. With Meta-Beatrice out of the picture, she'd basically taken over the position of trolling Battler to get him motivated.
__________________
|
|
2010-07-06, 17:59 | Link #2967 | |
BUY MY BOOK!!!
Join Date: May 2009
|
Quote:
The real question is, how would Battler notice this to coordinate with her? I can't imagine they can chat without Bern noticing.
__________________
|
|
2010-07-06, 18:24 | Link #2968 | |
Mystery buff
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Gone Fishin!
|
Quote:
She did say she could say in red that "Beato will never laugh again though". So I'm certain she thinks it's impossible for her to return to normal.
__________________
|
|
2010-07-06, 19:20 | Link #2969 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Warwick, RI
Age: 40
|
I'm in the middle of replaying Ep 5 and I've just gotten to the point where Knox's Decalogue is first introduced. Lambda says,
Quote:
|
|
2010-07-06, 19:33 | Link #2973 | |
Endless Witch-Doctor
Join Date: Mar 2010
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
2010-07-07, 16:45 | Link #2974 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Floor eh duh?
|
Newbie thoughts.
Um..this is my first post,and I've been reading these for along time.I'd just like to say something.
What if Shannon has a split personality?Yah I know it's probably been suggested before,but I do not mean shes Kannon.I mean that when Spoiler for Spoiler Scene:
|
2010-07-07, 20:58 | Link #2977 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
|
Quote:
By the way, did George even get a chance to propose to Shannon in EP5? Clearly this may not be a fixed factor in the game! Could mean something
__________________
|
|
2010-07-08, 01:04 | Link #2979 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Meta-Meta-Meta-Space
|
Quote:
... is all I can say while in this episode thread. 8) Quote:
Also, notice how EP4, the plans the Beatrice faction (mostly the servants) have had for the letter and their first twilight shenanigans have basically been overridden by a 'Kinzo.' And then how this exactly mirrors the meta-world where Beatrice lets 'Kinzo' take over for him a bit there.. |
||
2010-07-08, 01:21 | Link #2980 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Floor eh duh?
|
I'm sort of confused.
In EP 4,''Beatrice'' has ''burned ''Kinzo'''' after getting angry at Battler.In the game,does the game show Kinzo as ''Missing'',during this point?Because if we have the viewpoint of Spoiler for theory founded in EP5:
|
|
|