2009-11-13, 10:31 | Link #281 |
Gamyūsa
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Montreal
|
i came to that conclusion i first saw it in the preview. imo they shouldve kept the new movable cannons and mounted them like previous predecessors to rachel. its probably seraphim V2 on its back anyways. personally i like the small packaing of the hidden MS for his line of gundams.
|
2010-05-23, 03:03 | Link #285 |
Gamyūsa
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Montreal
|
i was looking at weapon pics of the akatski gundam and i came cross this
http://www.mahq.net/mecha/gundam/see...orb-01-73f.jpg its basically a handle hidden in the dragoon. was this ever used or was it an option it didnt have to fall back on? |
2010-05-26, 01:38 | Link #288 |
Where's the monoeye?
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Hargenteen
Age: 35
|
I was watching F91 the other night, and I noticed most solid shields used by the EFSF seem to be useless after one hit.
Are they designed to offer continuous protection against fire, or just good for one hit? |
2010-05-31, 17:48 | Link #290 | |
Ace Archer
Join Date: Jan 2006
Age: 36
|
Quote:
I believe the Hourglass shaped Habitats that ZAFT use also use reflectors to provide light and i guess the same principle of tilting them can simulate day night cycles |
|
2010-06-02, 08:08 | Link #291 | |
I am a Pie
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: In a fantasy.
|
Quote:
|
|
2011-01-17, 02:54 | Link #292 |
Where's the monoeye?
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Hargenteen
Age: 35
|
I was curious, beam shields are more effective than solid shields right? But since they're beams...does that mean they're harmful to the MS using it? Talking about UC beam shields by the way.
If a small bit of the shield brushed up against the MS that deployed it, would the MS get damaged? |
2011-01-17, 03:03 | Link #294 |
Where's the monoeye?
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Hargenteen
Age: 35
|
The F91 also threw a spare beam shield at an enemy MS like a shuriken, caused it to exploded. But if they're just as harmful to to an enemy MS as they are to the MS using it, does that really make them more effective?
Suppose there is a malfunction with the shield, and it cuts off the MS's arm or something. |
2011-01-17, 03:17 | Link #295 | |
Dark Energy
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: United States
|
Quote:
What I'd like to know is what made a beam shield superior to an I-field barrier.
__________________
|
|
2011-01-17, 03:26 | Link #296 |
Where's the monoeye?
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Hargenteen
Age: 35
|
An I-field only blocks beam weaponry. Where as a beam shield is able to deflect both particle weapons and solid rounds.
Example being in F91, a Jegan launched several grenades at a Crossbone MS and they all impacted and exploded when striking the beam shield. It's basically like an I-field, but much more effective, and covers all areas of possible attack. |
2011-01-17, 03:27 | Link #297 | |
The Tall One
Join Date: Jan 2006
|
Quote:
Also, is that it is easier to shape. If I remember correctly, I-field barriers need to be spherical, whereas beam shields can have a variety of shapes. Lastly, beam shields use less energy and space, therefore than can be placed on something as small as an MS, especially when you consider the smaller size of post-CCA MS, and the resulting reduction in MS real estate.
__________________
|
|
2011-01-17, 03:35 | Link #298 | ||
Dark Energy
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: United States
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
|
||
2011-01-18, 00:11 | Link #300 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
|
There is a difference between A I-field and a Beam Shield.
I-fields are only for anti-beam Beam Shields can deflect anything as long as it does not overload the beam generator. In Unicorn. we see the suit equipped with a I field generator in the shield. So my guess is by f91 the I-field help to reinforce the beam shield. |
Thread Tools | |
|
|