AnimeSuki Forums

Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Today's Posts Search

Go Back   AnimeSuki Forum > Anime Discussion > Older Series > Retired > Retired A-L > Fullmetal Alchemist

Notices

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old 2004-04-26, 23:28   Link #21
CardCaptorMoody
Dictator of the World
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Canada, In my basement playing DANCE DANCE REVOLUTION
Quote:
Originally Posted by +BakuretsuNavi
or .. it can be used to create fire and such (dbz i guess).
Mustang wasn't 'creating' fire (in a sence he was... but you know what I am trying to say)... he was just increasing the oxygen concentration in areas that he wanted and with a snap of a finger ignited the oxygen (which is very flamable).
CardCaptorMoody is offline  
Old 2004-04-27, 00:31   Link #22
Rheinhard
Feldmarschall
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Houston
Send a message via AIM to Rheinhard
Quote:
Originally Posted by CardCaptorMoody
... he was just increasing the oxygen concentration in areas that he wanted and with a snap of a finger ignited the oxygen (which is very flamable).
Actually, Oxygen isn't flammable at all, but since chemical burning requires oxygen, the presence of large amounts of oxygen will multiply the rapidity with which a flame burns. A matchstick struck in air will make a small flame, but the same matchstick struck in oxygen will nearly explode because it burns so much more quickly. This was the reason for the Apollo 1 tragedy - a small spark ignited velcro strips inside the capsule where Gus Grissom, Ed White, and Roger Chaffee were training. Velcro doesn't really burn in air, but in the presence of pure oxygen, such as was the atmospheric composition in the capsule, it can turn into a fireball when ignited.

As for alchemy, it was the medieval study of nature with strong elements of mysticism thrown in. A lot of the ideas mentioned in FMA, like the Philosopher's Stone, and the transmutation of base metal to gold, were objectives of alchemical study. But most of it was really bunk because the medieaval alchemists had no serious concept of what we now call the scientific method (forming a hypothesis, performing an experiment to test it, and refining the results to prove or disprove it).

The method used in most alchemy would probably be along the lines of "I think if I mix 10 drams of bituminous limestone with an distillation of mercury I can make gold! ... Hmm, that didn't work. What about sulfur and natron? Crap that didn't work either..." So basically the alchemist never got anywhere with the gold-making, but as a side effect of all their dorking around, eventually learned about properties of various chemicals as a side effect. So the practice of alchemy laid the basis for the modern science of chemistry. But to say that alchemy=chemistry is just wrong. And it certainly isn't physics-- alchemy had no concept of the atomic structure of matter and so on.
Rheinhard is offline  
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 18:30.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We use Silk.