AnimeSuki Forums

Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Today's Posts Search

Go Back   AnimeSuki Forum > General > General Chat > News & Politics

Notices

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old 2013-04-02, 02:19   Link #621
Ithekro
Gamilas Falls
 
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Republic of California
Age: 46
In an aftermath Korea, would it be allowed to be nuclear (North, South, or United).
__________________
Dessler Soto, Banzai!
Ithekro is online now  
Old 2013-04-02, 02:24   Link #622
NoemiChan
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Philippines
Age: 36
Send a message via Yahoo to NoemiChan
....with a NK government in exile in China...
NoemiChan is offline  
Old 2013-04-02, 02:25   Link #623
SaintessHeart
NYAAAAHAAANNNNN~
 
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Age: 35
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ridwan View Post
Consider this : in the wake of an actual deposition of the Kims from power should things really go bad for them, who will gonna replace them and what will become of NK ?
A more extremist regime that SK or China wouldn't tolerate prompting an invasion. It is either a unified Korea that invades Japan and attacks the rest of EA after 10 years of militarisation, or a pro-China SK and an eventual Chinese hegemony spanning the entire Asia.
__________________

When three puppygirls named after pastries are on top of each other, it is called Eclair a'la menthe et Biscotti aux fraises avec beaucoup de Ricotta sur le dessus.
Most of all, you have to be disciplined and you have to save, even if you hate our current financial system. Because if you don't save, then you're guaranteed to end up with nothing.
SaintessHeart is offline  
Old 2013-04-02, 04:09   Link #624
Vallen Chaos Valiant
Logician and Romantic
 
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Within my mind
Age: 43
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ithekro View Post
In an aftermath Korea, would it be allowed to be nuclear (North, South, or United).
It wouldn't actually matter. If China or South Korea runs it, they could, but won't, run nuclear powerplants because their is no point. Nuclear weapons are out of the question because what for? China or America would supply the nuclear deterrent.

In an aftermath, the priority would be rebuilding and spending money wisely. Nuclear power and Nuclear weapons would both be a waste of money for the rebuilding effort.
__________________
Vallen Chaos Valiant is offline  
Old 2013-04-02, 04:16   Link #625
kuroishinigami
Ava courtesy of patchy
 
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by SaintessHeart View Post
It is a mini 5MW nuclear reactor, so the fallout would be minimal.
How large is this minimal would be? As in how large the area that will be in danger level radiation? 2 km radius from reactor? 500 m?
kuroishinigami is offline  
Old 2013-04-02, 04:29   Link #626
SaintessHeart
NYAAAAHAAANNNNN~
 
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Age: 35
Quote:
Originally Posted by kuroishinigami View Post
How large is this minimal would be? As in how large the area that will be in danger level radiation? 2 km radius from reactor? 500 m?
Chernobyl is 1000MW, an old reactor. Fukushima is 5000MW, a newer reactor.

At 5MW and an old reactor with tech dated between those two references, not much damage I think.

PM Gundamfan0083. He is a nuclear scientist.
__________________

When three puppygirls named after pastries are on top of each other, it is called Eclair a'la menthe et Biscotti aux fraises avec beaucoup de Ricotta sur le dessus.
Most of all, you have to be disciplined and you have to save, even if you hate our current financial system. Because if you don't save, then you're guaranteed to end up with nothing.
SaintessHeart is offline  
Old 2013-04-02, 05:54   Link #627
Badkarma 1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
USS Fitzgerald (DDG-62)

USS Fitzgerald in the Coral Sea, June 2005
Career (US)
Name: USS Fitzgerald
Namesake: Lieutenant William Charles Fitzgerald, USN
Ordered: 22 February 1990
Builder: Bath Iron Works
Laid down: 9 February 1993
Launched: 29 January 1994
Commissioned: 14 October 1995
Nickname: Fighting Fitz
Status: in active service, as of 2013
Badge:
General characteristics
Displacement: Light: approx. 6,800 long tons (6,900 t)
Full: approx. 8,900 long tons (9,000 t)
Length: 505 ft (154 m)
Beam: 66 ft (20 m)
Draft: 31 ft (9.4 m)
Propulsion: 4 General Electric LM2500-30 gas turbines, two shafts, 100,000 total shaft horsepower (75 MW)
Speed: >30 knots (56 km/h)
Range: 4,400 nautical miles at 20 knots
(8,100 km at 37 km/h)
Complement: 33 Officers
38 Chief Petty Officers
210 Enlisted Personnel
Sensors and
processing systems:
AN/SPY-1D 3D Radar
AN/SPS-67(V)2 Surface Search Radar
AN/SPS-73(V)12 Surface Search Radar
AN/SQS-53C Sonar Array
AN/SQR-19 Tactical Towed Array Sonar
AN/SQQ-28 LAMPS III Shipboard System
Electronic warfare
& decoys:
AN/SLQ-32(V)2 Electronic Warfare System
AN/SLQ-25 Nixie Torpedo Countermeasures
MK 36 MOD 12 Decoy Launching System
AN/SLQ-39 CHAFF Buoys
Armament:
1 × 29 cell, 1 × 61 cell Mk 41 vertical launch systems with 90 × RIM-156 SM-2, BGM-109 Tomahawk or RUM-139 VL-Asroc missiles
1 × Mark 45 5/54 in (127/54 mm)
2 × 25 mm chain gun
4 × .50 caliber (12.7 mm) guns
2 × 20 mm Phalanx CIWS

2 × Mk 32 triple torpedo tubes
Aircraft carried: 1 SH-60 Sea Hawk helicopter can be embarked
Motto: Protect your People
USS Fitzgerald (DDG-62), named for Lieutenant William Charles Fitzgerald, USN (1938–1967) is an Arleigh Burke-class destroyer in the United States Navy. She was laid down by Bath Iron Works in Bath, Maine 9 February 1993; launched 29 January 1994; and commissioned 14 October 1995 in Newport, R.I. She was then homeported in Naval Station San Diego.
Gods Speed fellas!
Badkarma 1 is offline  
Old 2013-04-02, 06:04   Link #628
JokerD
Senior Member
 
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Quote:
Originally Posted by SaintessHeart View Post
Chernobyl is 1000MW, an old reactor. Fukushima is 5000MW, a newer reactor.

At 5MW and an old reactor with tech dated between those two references, not much damage I think.

PM Gundamfan0083. He is a nuclear scientist.
Please don't go for the nuclear reactors, SK has 4 sites with 23 (currently) reactors and NK have rockets.

Can anyone say radiation cloud?
JokerD is offline  
Old 2013-04-02, 06:08   Link #629
sa547
Senior Member
*Author
 
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Philippines
Age: 47
I find it a coincidence that this and Olympus just came out on show at the nearest cinemaplex.
__________________
sa547 is offline  
Old 2013-04-02, 06:23   Link #630
SaintessHeart
NYAAAAHAAANNNNN~
 
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Age: 35
Quote:
Originally Posted by JokerD View Post
Please don't go for the nuclear reactors, SK has 4 sites with 23 (currently) reactors and NK have rockets.

Can anyone say radiation cloud?
Actually just destroying the 2 bronze statues will do, followed by a leaflet drop courtesy of the yaoi doujinshis showing Kim Jong Un in BDSM NTR by a redneck. Since both Koreas are known to have chauvanist societies and Kim is prided to be "as masculine as his father and grandfather", an insult to his manhood will probably achieve the desired effect of driving him into a heart attack or completely nuts.

A couple of NLOS munitions from an artillery gun or missile launcher should do the trick. The rest is up to the printing services in SK.
__________________

When three puppygirls named after pastries are on top of each other, it is called Eclair a'la menthe et Biscotti aux fraises avec beaucoup de Ricotta sur le dessus.
Most of all, you have to be disciplined and you have to save, even if you hate our current financial system. Because if you don't save, then you're guaranteed to end up with nothing.
SaintessHeart is offline  
Old 2013-04-02, 07:00   Link #631
ganbaru
books-eater youkai
 
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Betweem wisdom and insanity
China expresses regret at North Korea restarting nuclear plant
http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/...93106720130402
__________________
ganbaru is offline  
Old 2013-04-02, 07:04   Link #632
NoemiChan
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Philippines
Age: 36
Send a message via Yahoo to NoemiChan
Quote:
Originally Posted by ganbaru View Post
China expresses regret at North Korea restarting nuclear plant
http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/...93106720130402
: Kim is making another stupid strategy, Mom!
NoemiChan is offline  
Old 2013-04-02, 08:36   Link #633
Kameruka
Hen-Tie
 
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Hen-Tie pen
Attack Iran first. Let North Korea lives.
Kameruka is offline  
Old 2013-04-02, 08:53   Link #634
SaintessHeart
NYAAAAHAAANNNNN~
 
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Age: 35
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kameruka View Post
Attack Iran first. Let North Korea lives.
Iran is pretty well-armed. And without a single enemy, the generally Sunni-ruled Mideast would have crushed Israel then fought amongst themselves, jeopardising the entire world's crude oil flow. The next thing you know figurines are 100,000 yen each despite being the size of nendroids.

And being the only moderate, stupid Turkey is behaving like the British. Just chilling out and minding their own business and doing business with everyone despite their well-known and respected former glories beholding epic-sized empires across planet Earth. I can't understand why sensible states and people wash their hands in golden bowls and let morons take over them instead of smacking all these manchild institutions into behaving like adults.

And from the News Stories thread :

Quote:
Originally Posted by SeijiSensei View Post
At least they gave these exercises an appropriate name, "Iron Fist," rather than the recent American approach of labeling acts of warfare as somehow humanitarian in nature like "Operation Provide Comfort" or "Enduring Freedom."
I find the name still inappropriate because :

Quote:
Originally Posted by SaintessHeart View Post
It should be renamed as "Loli Love Liberation".

Please support pertinent naming of exercises and operations.
__________________

When three puppygirls named after pastries are on top of each other, it is called Eclair a'la menthe et Biscotti aux fraises avec beaucoup de Ricotta sur le dessus.
Most of all, you have to be disciplined and you have to save, even if you hate our current financial system. Because if you don't save, then you're guaranteed to end up with nothing.

Last edited by SaintessHeart; 2013-04-02 at 09:27.
SaintessHeart is offline  
Old 2013-04-03, 06:33   Link #635
killer3000ad
Senior Member
 
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Australia
Age: 41
NK blocks SK access to Kaesong industrial zone
There are still 861 South Korean workers in Kaesong. No word on whether DPRK is allowing them to leave.
__________________
killer3000ad is offline  
Old 2013-04-03, 10:10   Link #636
ArchmageXin
Master of Coin
 
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by killer3000ad View Post
NK blocks SK access to Kaesong industrial zone
There are still 861 South Korean workers in Kaesong. No word on whether DPRK is allowing them to leave.
The better question is why was North Korea was allowed to own this piece of prime real estate.

Let me think. 54,000 workers * 144 * 12= 80 million + of direct wages, and estimated as much as 2 billion dollars worth of trade for NK.

So while China get pilloried by the UN and the west for trading with NK all year long/watering down sanctions...

why is SK allowed to provide as much as 1/5 of NK's GDP unscathed?
ArchmageXin is offline  
Old 2013-04-03, 10:48   Link #637
Roger Rambo
Sensei, aishite imasu
 
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Hong Kong Shatterdome
Quote:
Originally Posted by killer3000ad View Post
NK blocks SK access to Kaesong industrial zone
There are still 861 South Korean workers in Kaesong. No word on whether DPRK is allowing them to leave.
South Korean Workers already in the park were allowed to leave. SK workers trying to enter were barred.

Quote:
The South Korean workers already in the complex were allowed out, but those seeking to enter in the morning were not given access. This comes on the heels of a March 30 statement in which North Korea threatened to close the complex if there was “any attempt to damage the dignity” of the country.
It makes sense that North Korea wouldn't take hostages. While they're in a confrontation with the UN/South Korea right now, long term they need that industrial park. And no South Korean company would send anyone into the park if they knew they could become potential hostages. And given the current tension, taking hundreds of South Korean civilians hostage would be a sure fire way to start a war.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ArchmageXin View Post
The better question is why was North Korea was allowed to own this piece of prime real estate.

Let me think. 54,000 workers * 144 * 12= 80 million + of direct wages, and estimated as much as 2 billion dollars worth of trade for NK.

So while China get pilloried by the UN and the west for trading with NK all year long/watering down sanctions...

why is SK allowed to provide as much as 1/5 of NK's GDP unscathed?
Probably because the park is less about commercial opportunism, and more about fostering better relations between the North and the South. Not an unreasonable desire considering that the two nations share an extremely militarized border. The South Koreans do have a vested interest in trying to better relations with the North.

There's also the fact that South Korea is big buddies with the USA, who are the main force behind the sanctions. The US isn't exactly gonna internationally criticize South Korea's policies for dealing with North Korea.
Roger Rambo is offline  
Old 2013-04-03, 11:00   Link #638
Ridwan
Senior Member
 
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: قلوب المؤمنين
Quote:
Originally Posted by SaintessHeart View Post
And being the only moderate, stupid Turkey is behaving like the British. Just chilling out and minding their own business and doing business with everyone despite their well-known and respected former glories beholding epic-sized empires across planet Earth. I can't understand why sensible states and people wash their hands in golden bowls and let morons take over them instead of smacking all these manchild institutions into behaving like adults.
Not invading all over middle east is the only way to remain sane and thus, a candidate for a stabilizing factor in the region. Also, Arab Spring caught everyone by surprise, including Turkey, and jumping into opened cans of worms is the last thing they should do. Not to mention not everyone at home has come to sense that knocking Europe's door will never achieve anything, so that needs to be sorted out, along with Kurdish issue and moving on from the '30s in general.
__________________
Ridwan is offline  
Old 2013-04-03, 11:02   Link #639
willx
Nyaaan~~
 
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Age: 40
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roger Rambo View Post
There's also the fact that South Korea is big buddies with the USA, who are the main force behind the sanctions. The US isn't exactly gonna internationally criticize South Korea's policies for dealing with North Korea.
There's also the fact that like the Berlin Wall, families and a shared identity (arguable?) continue to exist between the people on either side. It makes me curious about the China/Taiwan situation.

In either of these cases actual outright conflict will result in divided families and distant relatives potentially killing each other. This "link" will shrink over time though as generations die off, in particular the former case NK/SK due to travel restrictions. I wonder if the likelihood for actual war will actually increase over time rather than decrease (/wild speculation)
__________________
Nyaaaan~~
willx is offline  
Old 2013-04-03, 11:07   Link #640
Vallen Chaos Valiant
Logician and Romantic
 
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Within my mind
Age: 43
Quote:
Originally Posted by willx View Post
There's also the fact that like the Berlin Wall, families and a shared identity (arguable?) continue to exist between the people on either side. It makes me curious about the China/Taiwan situation.
The Taiwan situation is different. Culturally we are closer to Japan than China, and when Chiang came he made a mess of the place. Generation of brainwashing couldn't make us hate Japan, and that's where the our loyalties lie today. Taiwan is scared of China, there is no brotherly love there.
__________________
Vallen Chaos Valiant is offline  
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 22:25.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We use Silk.