2010-08-25, 14:21 | Link #822 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
|
Well, shit... That's true. It's like Battler really is Kinzo, just that instead of intending to fuck his daughter, he goes for his half sister! Well, it's either that, or his half aunt.
Anyway, isn't it said that Shannon's and Beatrice's tits were an illusion? I hadn't given that a thought until now, and I'm slightly depressed.
__________________
|
2010-08-25, 18:13 | Link #823 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
|
Quote:
|
|
2010-08-25, 19:34 | Link #824 |
別にいいけど
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: forever lost inside a logic error
|
finally I finished reading EP7
there's a lot of things to say so I'll just write the most important opinions I have. I believe that for the most part the story Cler narrated is Beatrice's true story. There a few things here and there that raises some reasonable doubts for generally it should be correct. At the same time I believe that the tea party was for the most part a lie. Of course Bern had to create a very consistent story, and if even Will wasn't able to destroy it then it was well conceived from a mystery standpoint. However the mere fact that will uses quotation marks when refers to Bern's "truth" is a clear sign that we are not really supposed to think it's actually the truth. Despite what everyone expected to see, shkanon was neither confirmed nor denied, however more hints are added in favor the theory. The things that bothers me is that Beatrice's story basically skips the whole part related to Kanon and covers the truth with magic both in the case of Shannon's and Kanon's displacement in the story. The first "world change" is easy to explain the second is a real puzzle. then again Kanon's existence must be closely related to Beatrice since apparently he doesn't exist in Lion's world. Shannontrice is at this point 99% confirmed. I don't even think I need to go in detail. Will's answers to the closed rooms mysteries suggest that in most cases the solution is simply that everything is an illusion. Some answers are very hard to understand, however that the chainlock of EP1 2nd twilight wasn't set in the first place and that the chapel's door in EP2 wasn't closed to begin with seem to be the most logical interpretations. If that's the case then the fake serial murder plot involving almost all the relatives except Battler is the most likely scenario. The last flashbacks that appear when the entrails of Cler are ripped off are probably very important. that part where Beatrice asks Nanjo and Genji why they saved her if she had to live with a terrible injury is probably an important factor to understand her motives. that also seems the origin of the word "furniture". Less than human, that means probably that she has lost a body part. I find it hard to accept that Beatrice2 is Kinzo's daughter. Not just because of the incest stuff. First off, it's unthinkable that Beatrice2 was almost identical to her mother if she was half asian. At any rate she shouldn't have neither blonde hair nor blue eyes. Maybe the hairs were dyed but eyes? contact lenses? That seems unlikely. the other reason is that it was never actually stated that she is Kinzo's daughter. Nanjo only says that later a child was born. More importantly Bern laughing evilishly tells Lion that he is at the same time Kinzo's child and Beatrice's grandchild. Am I the only one that think that Bern wouldn't have missed the chance to tell him that he was at the same time Kinzo's child and Kinzo's grandchild if that was true? Anyway I don't deny that the odds that indeed Beatrice3 shares 75% of her genes with Kinzo are high.
__________________
|
2010-08-25, 19:34 | Link #825 | |
Back off, I'm a scientist
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: In a badly written story.
|
Quote:
Possible reasons to blow up the island with good (or at least morally acceptable if vigilante justice is) intentions: http://forums.animesuki.com/showthread.php?p=3207814 and further down. I can think of more. Arguments why the bomber and the culprit are different people should be obvious: If you want to kill everyone, the bomb is your best weapon, trying to kill people one by one might make them explore, preventing people from running away from the bomb is trivial if you can pull the closed rooms seen. If you want to use the bomb as a failure time limit on epitaph solution, if you want people to solve the epitaph, killing them is counterproductive. If you don't want them to solve the epitaph but want them to try, killing them before the time limit is simply not sporting. Someone who combines the roles of bomber and culprit is not behaving rationally, and to be honest, is pointlessly sadistic. So far, nobody has offered a reason to do it for Beatrice other than "I hate my life and want to die, but killing people in gruesome and bewildering ways before that might make Battler remember me and forget all those people I killed to make him remember the horrible sin of making me love him." No, really, understanding does not necessarily mean forgiving, and you don't write love letters with the blood of other people in polite society either.
__________________
|
|
2010-08-25, 19:46 | Link #826 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
|
Quote:
So that just means the issue here is "who is the true culprit?" We've come up with plausible, even likely methods of executing the crimes. Each individual has a possible motive (especially Nanjo, with his legendary grudge against those who defeat him in board games, avenging himself first against the one who harmed his reputation for invincibility, and then by eliminating their entire families), so there's a plethora of "whydunnits", so now we need to hash out the possible "whodunnits", I guess. I think ive made my personal opinion clear about the "whodunnit" already |
|
2010-08-25, 19:49 | Link #827 |
別にいいけど
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: forever lost inside a logic error
|
Or the whydunnit you came up with really valid?
Will really stressed out how important it is to not take lightly someone's heart. To simply say that "person X did it for money" is kinda shallow. That seemed to be the thing that mostly ticked Will off about Bern's "truth".
__________________
|
2010-08-25, 20:01 | Link #828 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
|
Quote:
|
|
2010-08-25, 20:06 | Link #829 |
別にいいけど
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: forever lost inside a logic error
|
Maybe Will really is the word of God in this case, if you consider that the writer is the god of his own novel and that whole deal about the importance of the whydunnit that repeated itself over and over in this episode is probably a message from Ryuukishi.
__________________
|
2010-08-25, 20:09 | Link #830 | |
Artist
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Yesterday!
|
Quote:
Correct me if I'm wrong but it seems that it says something along the lines of (Beato2) "she grew up to look exactly like her mother". Doesn't that imply that she didn't "start" as Beato 2 and "became" so as she grew up to ressemble her mother? In that case she'd probably need a real, more former name, and be less bothered by her identity, not to mention hardly be able to believe she's really a sealed away witch. Don't think anything would clearly rule out Beato 1 having a child from another man, possibly being already pregnant when she met Kinzo. After all Kinzo had the rest of his children with another woman. |
|
2010-08-25, 20:13 | Link #831 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
|
Quote:
I personally consider her more of a red herring myself in the first place. |
|
2010-08-25, 20:14 | Link #832 | |
Back off, I'm a scientist
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: In a badly written story.
|
Quote:
The reason for thinking that is that I am more and more convinced that in particular, the epitaph solution party described in the first letter Beatrice sends actually has nothing to do with murder, real or simulated. Every time I bring up the idea that it's an independent plot and point at the text of the letter, everyone just glazes over it but offers no counterarguments, which probably means I'm on the right track.
__________________
|
|
2010-08-25, 20:17 | Link #834 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
|
Quote:
Shkannon would fit this role. Its also entirely possible that there is only one plot that has murder as its initial goal, and another entirely which only kills as a reaction to the true culprits actions. |
|
2010-08-25, 20:18 | Link #835 |
BUY MY BOOK!!!
Join Date: May 2009
|
The person who knows about every plot (Nanjo) need not be the person actually doing the killings (Nanjo), he or she just has to be useful enough (Nanjo) and easily-coerced enough (Nanjo) to spill the beans to anyone who might prove threatening (Nanjo). Someone who remains active long enough to talk (Nanjo).
I wonder who fits those circumstances.
__________________
|
2010-08-25, 20:21 | Link #836 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
|
Quote:
Edit: In all seriousness, just substitute Nanjo for Krauss in the above rant. Last edited by TehChron; 2010-08-25 at 20:28. Reason: Weak joke was weak |
|
2010-08-25, 20:31 | Link #837 | |
Back off, I'm a scientist
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: In a badly written story.
|
Quote:
You don't "see" Krauss.
__________________
|
|
2010-08-25, 20:31 | Link #838 | ||
別にいいけど
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: forever lost inside a logic error
|
Quote:
the reason I am 100% sure that Kinzo had black hairs, as he should, is the comment that Beatrice makes after Kinzo jokingly says that Beatrice's hair are of the same color of pasta. Beatrice says that then all japanese hairs are like "spaghetti al nero di seppia" which are black because of the squid's black ink. Clearly if Kinzo really had white hairs that joke would be kinda strange. Quote:
Hey this is just one thing over a lot of stuff said in a whole episode! We probably disagree about everything else.
__________________
|
||
2010-08-25, 22:10 | Link #840 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
|
Quote:
Anyway, Quote:
Heh, by the logic you would use to implicate Krauss, you could also say Eva really was the culprit. |
||
|
|