2006-09-10, 09:10 | Link #141 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
|
Quote:
OFFTOPIC ---- That sort of sounds like the US procurement program. A perhaps more realistic production order would probably be Strike as the technology demonstrator, a Strike Dagger prototype, the Strike Dagger limited production series, a 105 Dagger prototype, and then the 105 Dagger production series. Making any major changes generally requires another prototype before tooling up for mass-production. Offtopic: Quote:
__________________
|
||
2006-09-10, 13:25 | Link #142 |
神
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Chi-town
|
Like I said, the original strike was a benchmark. They got the data from the original strike and they figured, grunts can't do crap with the strike since none of them has the piloting skills kira had in seed so why not we make them out of cheap parts? Then ofcourse, when they did go with the cheap parts, that new strike didn't fare so well cause the grunts absolutely sucked. And they did the revisions once again and we now have the perfect suit for grunt units, too bad the grunts still suck.
See the logic? |
2006-09-10, 21:32 | Link #143 | |
Logician and Romantic
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Within my mind
Age: 43
|
Quote:
One can argue that the truly revolutionary component of the original Strike was the packs. And that was the advance given the most attention. Even ZAFT feel the need to copy that with the Wizard packs. Phase-shift armour in CE, IMO, is like alloy wheels or rear-spoiler on a road car; it improves performance, but not by enough to justify it to be installed in standard models. As for the Gundam OS? As far as I can tell, the OS isn't an issue anymore.
__________________
|
|
2006-09-10, 23:10 | Link #144 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
|
My point is that as long as any major changes are made, then they would have to redo the prototyping process. The reasons for making such changes are pretty much irrelevant; it's the fact that they have to alter how the new machine has to be designed, and how it is built that's important. It's not as simple as just removing the Phase-Shift armor, they have to figure out what kind of material is going to be used in its place, how much that new armor is going to weigh, and how its mass is going to be distributed. All of this entails a large amount of redesign, and hence calls for a new prototype. It would be accurate to say that the Strike Daggers are descended from the Strike family of designs, but it's sort of stretching things to call Strike an actual prototype for the Strike Dagger.
Sort of offtopic: Phase-Shift armor is valuable simply because there are still many battlefield threats that are unable to defeat it. Offering effective immunity from entire classes of weapons is an extremely attractive advantage for any weapon design. While it may not be cost effective to incorporate for current mass-produced models, it's quite obvious that the mobile suit designers haven't given up on doing so. In a way, it's akin to the US military's handling of stealth technology. Originally, it was only used in a small of B-2s, F-117s, and maybe SR-71s, but it's supposed to be incorporated into hundreds of F-22s and F-35s in the near future.
__________________
|
|
|