AnimeSuki Forums

Register Forum Rules FAQ Members List Social Groups Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Go Back   AnimeSuki Forum > General > General Chat > News & Politics

Notices

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old 2012-11-14, 14:03   Link #3241
Vallen Chaos Valiant
Logician and Romantic
 
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Within my mind
Age: 43
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ruby Princess View Post
It's okay, I'm sure the war will just last a few months.
See, the difference is the states that talk about leaving are not pure red states. They are only red because of the electoral college. So they would have to deal with a civil war internally as much as externally.
__________________
Vallen Chaos Valiant is offline  
Old 2012-11-14, 14:07   Link #3242
ChainLegacy
廉頗
 
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Massachusetts
Age: 34
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vallen Chaos Valiant View Post
See, the difference is the states that talk about leaving are not pure red states. They are only red because of the electoral college. So they would have to deal with a civil war internally as much as externally.
Plus, they don't have a modern Lee to make their inferior numbers last so long. (Just kidding... I'm sure a hypothetical civil war in the US would end badly no matter what in the modern age).
ChainLegacy is offline  
Old 2012-11-14, 14:07   Link #3243
mangamuscle
formerly ogon bat
 
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Mexico
Age: 53
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ruby Princess View Post
It's okay, I'm sure the war will just last a few months.
I remember reading there were more casualties due to the civil war than any other war the USA has fought, is overpopulation really such a big problem in the USA?
mangamuscle is offline  
Old 2012-11-14, 14:11   Link #3244
GDB
Senior Member
 
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Age: 38
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ruby Princess View Post
It's okay, I'm sure the war will just last a few months.
That's still a ridiculous statement to make. "It's okay, I'm sure we'll only have a few months of millions of people dying."

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vallen Chaos Valiant View Post
See, the difference is the states that talk about leaving are not pure red states. They are only red because of the electoral college. So they would have to deal with a civil war internally as much as externally.
As demonstrated in one of those articles about the petitions, Austin and San Antonio filed petitions to secede from Texas because they aren't loonies and want to stay with the US.
GDB is offline  
Old 2012-11-14, 14:13   Link #3245
Ithekro
Gamilas Falls
 
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Republic of California
Age: 46
Battle of Antietam (September 17, 1862) is still the bloodiest day for America. About 23,000 dead and wounded. (there were more American combat deaths in this one battle that in the entire Iraqi War.)

Both sides thought the Civil War in 1861 would only last three months, with nine months tops. It lasted until 1865.
__________________
Dessler Soto, Banzai!
Ithekro is offline  
Old 2012-11-14, 14:19   Link #3246
monir
cho~ kakkoii
*Moderator
 
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: 3rd Planet
Quote:
Originally Posted by ogon_bat View Post
I remember reading there were more casualties due to the civil war than any other war the USA has fought, is overpopulation really such a big problem in the USA?
In the battle of Gettysburg, there were roughly 50000 people died/wounded/missing in a single day.
__________________
Kudara nai na! Sig by TheEroKing.
Calling on all Naruto fans, One Piece fans, and Shounen-fans in general... I got two words for you: One-Punch Man!
Executive member of the ASS. Ready to flee at the first sign of trouble.
monir is offline  
Old 2012-11-14, 14:21   Link #3247
Solace
(ノಠ益ಠ)ノ彡┻━┻
*Moderator
 
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vallen Chaos Valiant View Post
How about something old instead?

Like, "don't tell blatant lies"?


Or at least, politically punish people who simply make things up? This used to happen you know, when politicians try to hide their dishonesty because they were afraid of being caught.

Now of course, to tell lies is just another tool. The assumption is that people who won't vote for you are the only people who would notice you are lying, so why not lie to the people who would fall for it?
Tell me lies, tell me sweet little lies....

Quote:
Originally Posted by ChainLegacy View Post
I don't buy into there being a real threat of secession, but do recall the last time our country had a secession problem it was indeed prompted by a presidential election (there were many factors involved, but the confederacy formed as a result of Lincoln's election).

If we follow the example from the past, we've got about 4-5 months before any actual secession takes place. .
Lincoln was definitely one of the biggest sparks. Funny how then and now are largely the result of economics though. Also ironic that Obama often cites Lincoln.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ruby Princess View Post
It's okay, I'm sure the war will just last a few months.
It won't be war. Just terrorism.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ogon_bat View Post
I remember reading there were more casualties due to the civil war than any other war the USA has fought, is overpopulation really such a big problem in the USA?
Turns out massive battles with muskets and cannons creates a lot of injuries, but not many instant kills. Medicine pretty much sucked until the discovery of penicillin.
__________________
Solace is offline  
Old 2012-11-14, 14:21   Link #3248
Ruby Princess
Member
 
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Quote:
Originally Posted by GDB View Post
That's still a ridiculous statement to make. "It's okay, I'm sure we'll only have a few months of millions of people dying."
It's just a joke playing off the fact that we were acting like this is a re-enactment of the Civil War (where many back then said the same thing)... >_> I know that any war at all would be a war too long...
Ruby Princess is offline  
Old 2012-11-14, 14:28   Link #3249
monir
cho~ kakkoii
*Moderator
 
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: 3rd Planet
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ruby Princess View Post
It's just a joke playing off the fact that we were acting like this is a re-enactment of the Civil War (where many back then said the same thing)... >_> I know that any war at all would be a war too long...
It's pretty much one of the reason when I see seemingly intelligent people cater to bullshits. And besides, modern warfare is fought a little bit differently. There was a reason why Patriot Act defines how an US citizen can meet the classification of a terrorist under certain set of condition. And then you've the necessary justification to send in the unmanned drones....

Crap... now I'm starting to sound like Gundamfan... I'll go cool off with a dose of reality. Later folks.
__________________
Kudara nai na! Sig by TheEroKing.
Calling on all Naruto fans, One Piece fans, and Shounen-fans in general... I got two words for you: One-Punch Man!
Executive member of the ASS. Ready to flee at the first sign of trouble.
monir is offline  
Old 2012-11-14, 14:40   Link #3250
Jinto
Asuki-tan Kairin ↓
 
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Fürth (GER)
Age: 43
Quote:
Originally Posted by ogon_bat View Post
But as the article says many genes have been identified having an effect on intelligence and as gene sequencing becomes cheaper and cheaper and computers keep getting faster it is just a matter of years (less than ten IMO) before the DNA rosetta stone is finally deciphered *starts to salivate thinking in all the biological breakthroughs, cat girls ftw >_<*
I am a professional software developer, and I know how hard it is to decompile and reverse engineer binary code. I certainly believe that the programming in the human genome is more complex than the average operating system these days. To reverse engineer and understand an operating system just from reading its binary code is incredibly complicated. Its still a lot easier then DNA reverse engineering, since the operating system as well as its modules and methods are not using much polymorphism to retrieve their results (they are mostly build according to a single responsibility principle and offer a well defined interaction paradigm - using interfaces).

The human DNA uses 4 basic nucleobases which means it holds twice the information per quaterny "bit".

But thats not the main problem. The real problem is how this data is used to create an organic lifeform. It is extremely polymorphic (actually a combination of extreme recursiveness and polymorphism).

This is an attempt to demonstrate this polymorphic recursiveness:

The DNA is the blue print for all sorts of organic basic modules. In the first iteration, these basic modules define the immidiate behaviour of the cell. But when the cell is influenced by the creation of the basic modules, it will alternate its basic module building behaviour according to the DNA (recursive polymorphism in a feedback system).

Complex organic life typically starts as one cell, from this cell more diverse variants of cells are created through cell division. Somehow there is a preprogrammed cell diversfication algorithm in the DNA. It might start randomly with certain cells becoming a little different, and their offsprings become a little different some more (this form of parent cell => child cell creation is another recursive process, and since the cells diversify ever more in the process, it is also polymorphic).

Once there are different types of cells, they seem to organize in patterns that create organs, cells of different types might actually interact in a very complex way to give the organs a predefined way to grow. However, this must be considered a recursive and polymorphic process.

Each of the layers above is based on a very complex interaction algorithm. But this algorithm does not work entirely correct without interaction of each of the three layers. (consider complex life an incredibly complex and polymorphic fractal)

Now even this simplicist take on it results in quite a messy code. In reality this whole process is certainly more complex. To really understand each and every implication of changing certain parts of it, requires modelling and understanding that far surpasses current and near future technology.

Admittedly the DNA contains a lot of garbage information, but there is still plenty of relevant information in it.

So, the best you can hope for, is that scientists make some sense of the data by comparing DNA of individuums with minor differences. However, that doesn't mean they really understand the whole algorithm. They just know how to tweak certain parts of the code to get certain, minor changes. It is still a long way (read very very very long) to the understanding that is needed to completely remodel complex organisms in ways that produce relatively predictable results based on "DNA programming".
__________________
Folding@Home, Team Animesuki

Last edited by Jinto; 2012-11-14 at 14:59.
Jinto is offline  
Old 2012-11-14, 15:02   Link #3251
Anh_Minh
I disagree with you all.
 
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
And of course, there is the whole problem of defining and predicting intelligence.

And the lack of samples of early human DNA.

And the simple observation that hunter gatherers still exist, even if they're rare. While they're much better than we are at hunting and gathering (at least the kind of hunting that doesn't involve modern or medieval weapons), I've never heard of them being noticeably smarter than we are.

Quote:
“I would wager that if an average citizen from Athens of 1000BC were to appear suddenly among us, he or she would be among the brightest and most intellectually alive of our colleagues and companions, with a good memory, a broad range of ideas and a clear-sighted view of important issues,” Professor Crabtree says in a provocative paper published in the journal Trends in Genetics.
I'm pretty sure all he'd say at first would be "holy shit, what happened? What sorcery is this" in Ancient Greek.
Anh_Minh is offline  
Old 2012-11-14, 15:07   Link #3252
mangamuscle
formerly ogon bat
 
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Mexico
Age: 53
@Jinto I understand what you are trying to say, but my conclusion are based on the fact that human advancement has rarely been a gradual process, along the way there have been a genius that makes a big step in advancing science or technology. So i.e. without Einstein there would be no satellites in orbit and without newton I bet there would have been no landing on the moon. Maybe I am an optimist, nay, a fool, but I stand by my beliefs nevertheless.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Anh_Minh View Post
And the simple observation that hunter gatherers still exist, even if they're rare.
It is really rare to find any community that does not have access to modern medicine, tools and cloths to some extent and therefore no longer have to use their brains to survive like people thousands of years ago. Hell, my grandmother still had extensive knowledge of herbal remedies (gathered thru word of mouth), modern doctors no longer have to check a book, they only need to do a search on their computers.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Solace View Post
Turns out massive battles with muskets and cannons creates a lot of injuries, but not many instant kills. Medicine pretty much sucked until the discovery of penicillin.
I will take any day a bullet wound instead of a pellet from a musket which lacked the precision of modern weapons but basically destroyed whatever they hit (there is no such thing as an entry and exit wound). Even modern medicine would have a hard time dealing with such extensive wounds.

Last edited by mangamuscle; 2012-11-14 at 15:21.
mangamuscle is offline  
Old 2012-11-14, 15:13   Link #3253
Ithekro
Gamilas Falls
 
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Republic of California
Age: 46
Wonders of wisdom rather than intelligence maybe? Sometimes those that may not grasp something like a particle accelerator can be extermely wise.

"Smart" can be a variable depending on the subject matter. One can be smart in one field and totally inept in another.
__________________
Dessler Soto, Banzai!
Ithekro is offline  
Old 2012-11-14, 15:15   Link #3254
Zakoo
Senior Member
 
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Gensokyo
I don't know what you guys are arguing, that guy has a thesis that can not be proven untrue, nor true. I can also say dinosaurs all died from the flue (if my memories are correct somebody put such a hypothesis), impossible to prove I say nonsense, but impossible to prove I don't spout nonsense either.

And first of all, what is >intellect<? Rational thinking? Learning? Art? Discoveries? Imagination? Meeh, there's so much way of defining it.
Zakoo is offline  
Old 2012-11-14, 15:28   Link #3255
Jinto
Asuki-tan Kairin ↓
 
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Fürth (GER)
Age: 43
Quote:
Originally Posted by ogon_bat View Post
@Jinto I understand what you are trying to say, but my conclusion are based on the fact that human advancement has rarely been a gradual process, along the way there have been a genius that makes a big step in advancing science or technology. So i.e. without Einstein there would be no satellites in orbit and without newton I bet there would have been no landing on the moon. Maybe I am an optimist, nay, a fool, but I stand by my beliefs nevertheless.
That is true. But when you ask people, what they think, mostly based on popular believe... how the future will look like, then it will most likely be a different future.
There are many prime examples of old movies and literature that describe a future of things - that is actually history today according to the timeline - but still far far away future according to the technological progress. But at the same time they fail to predict the rapid progress in other fields. So, predictions based on (popular) believe are kinda fun. But thats it.

Of course there is always a chance for a game changing break through on a another field of science that seriously influences the progress of (many) other fields of science. But even then... if you have some technical knowledge that allows you to see the road blocks on the way... and you see a planet sized road block on that way, you can estimate, that the chances are rather dim for an occurence of such a significant break through in a field of science to overcome it.
__________________
Folding@Home, Team Animesuki
Jinto is offline  
Old 2012-11-14, 15:29   Link #3256
ganbaru
books-eater youkai
 
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Betweem wisdom and insanity
Obama Bristles at McCain Over Pledge to Block Susan Rice Nomination over Benghazi
http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics...hazi-comments/
__________________
ganbaru is offline  
Old 2012-11-14, 15:46   Link #3257
Haak
Me, An Intellectual
 
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: UK
Age: 33
Quote:
Originally Posted by Anh_Minh View Post
I'm pretty sure all he'd say at first would be "holy shit, what happened? What sorcery is this" in Ancient Greek.
He ought to watch Thermae Romae.
Haak is offline  
Old 2012-11-14, 15:58   Link #3258
mangamuscle
formerly ogon bat
 
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Mexico
Age: 53
@Jinto TBT average people do not create the images of what future technology will look like, you are obviously talking about the fact that in the second half of the xx century rocket science took one of those huge steps I was talking about with the launch of the first artificial earth satellite and many scientists (and science fiction writers) expected there would be many of those huge steps in the near future, that belief was fueled by the human landing of the moon, but all of them were just gradual advancements, so even if nasa's budget hadn't been cut each year after the apollo program cancellation, there would have been no successful missions to mars and beyond.

I am not aware that cat girls (the example and cited, I could talk all day about similar advancements but I will spare you all) are nowadays a common answer to what people expect from the future, I think that even in an otaku only poll there are no expectations at all that someday technology might produce them IRL.

As for the planet sized roadblock, I do not see such thing, just a hurdle that modern technology at the current speed of innovation will tackle in the near future, what I would call a planet sized roadblock is i.e. the speed of light limit which no matter if we invent antimatter reactors would block any possibility to visit but the closest of star systems.
mangamuscle is offline  
Old 2012-11-14, 16:08   Link #3259
Vexx
Obey the Darkly Cute ...
*Author
 
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: On the whole, I'd rather be in Kyoto ...
Age: 66
Quote:
Originally Posted by ganbaru View Post
Obama Bristles at McCain Over Pledge to Block Susan Rice Nomination over Benghazi
http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics...hazi-comments/
I'm watching "old white men" having a temper tantrum in public, attacking anything that moves, and blowing an incident of a type that barely got newspaper attention during Republican administrations into a grandstanding folderol. (yeah, that's a real word stupid spellchecker).

A review of the history of such attacks under all the administrations of the past 50 years or so

http://mediamatters.org/research/201...-bash-o/189890
__________________
Vexx is offline  
Old 2012-11-14, 16:27   Link #3260
kyp275
Meh
 
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by ogon_bat View Post
As for the planet sized roadblock, I do not see such thing, just a hurdle that modern technology at the current speed of innovation will tackle in the near future, what I would call a planet sized roadblock is i.e. the speed of light limit which no matter if we invent antimatter reactors would block any possibility to visit but the closest of star systems.
I think it's worth noting that in highly specialized fields of science and engineering, it would take a sufficient level of knowledge on the subject matter to truly appreciate the challenges and difficulties that lies therein. Much like someone unfamiliar with engineering would not be able to see the complexities involved in constructing a modern high performance jet engine, I doubt most of us can really appreciate how daunting a task interpreting the interwoven mechanics of DNA either.

It's interesting though, how you believe that mankind will obtain full mastery over the foundation of life itself in the near future based on optimism, yet at the same time readily dismisses the possibility of interstellar travel for eternity despite both fields of science are really still in their infancy.
kyp275 is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:29.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We use Silk.