mangamuscle |
2012-05-22 15:54 |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Haak
(Post 4171599)
But you said they only started backtracking after Ehud Barak left office, which was approximately a decade ago.
|
Yeah,after nearly three decades of stalling clinton twisted both sides arm into a peace deal, that was some advancement, then one year later they backtracked in the deal and have been continuind to doing so ever since, that is why is plain bonkers to say they have not stalled and that they havent gone against UN resolution 242, maybe if bush hadn't won back in 2000 and if Al Gore had continue to push both sides into going forward with the peace deal we would not be discussing it, but todays reality is plain foir everyone to see.
Quote:
"Because is Israel beligerance that started it all" is what you said,
|
If you want to go to the start of it all, yeah, before ww2 the Israelis pushed for the creation of a state of their own knowing quite well that land had already been occupied by the palestines for centuries.But hey, the UN approved the deal and everybody must accept the boundaries the UN set for the state of Israel. But the whole problem would never had happened if they hadn't make a push to take the land of other people.
Quote:
so yes that was your point. And Iran is just as much capable as Israel is.
|
The sad thing is that the previous president of Iran was a moderate that wasn't really interested in attacking Israel, but the USA had to elect a beligerant president like G. W. Bush and they obviously elected a beligerant president hoping it will protect them. Extremes have a need for their opposite, when the world is at peace nobody votes for extremists. So mark my words, if whoever is elected in 2012 for president of the USA shows beligerancy towards Iran you can be damn sure that in 2013 they will elect a beligerant president.
|