DarkWarrior |
2006-08-23 13:40 |
Quote:
Originally Posted by LynnieS
The V fins on its forehead? I would be afraid to transform it into its MA mode if that's the case, to tell you the truth. :) It might be too easily breakable even at the 1/100 scale. From the photo, the head's V fins look a bit big to fold up cleanly as well, IMHO.
|
I have to agree, breakable V-fins would be a problem.. and they do look to big to fold up. But at the same time, I don't want the V-fins to sort of stick out like they do in the HG 1/144. :)
Quote:
To me and looking at the photo, its upper arms is slightly too thin relative to the shoulders, forearms and legs, which look like they are carrying a substantial amount of armor - almost a Popeye look. The face is a bit thin and overpowered by the parts at the sides of the head, and with these vents(?), the head kind of reminds me of a chipmunk with two walnuts stuffed in its cheeks. :heh: The head doesn't look entirely proportionate to the body either, but it could just be from the angle of the photo; looking at some of the models that I have also, they have pretty small heads as well.
|
Yup, I agree with everything you mentioned. I liked how Stargazer looked in the lineart, but this is definitely something I won't be picking up. Unless of course, this is just a very early prototype.
Quote:
Originally Posted by McChar
just read the gunota post for new kits, including
"MG GAT-X105 Strike Gundam IWSP - w/ Grand Slam, October, 4,410 yen"
|
I bet it's the same old MG Strike with IWSP included... I wish Bandai would release a Strike weapons pack or something, that includes MG Sword, Launcher, IWSP, among others. If you already have a MG Strike, this is just a waste of money.
|