Celeron vs Hi10p
Can somebody please tell me if a laptop running with a Celeron M 743 running at 1.3Ghz is capable of playing a 720p 10-bit h264 video? The graphics chip is an integrated Intel 4500, but there's no hardware 10-bit decoder anyway, so I'm guessing everything is up to the CPU. Somebody mentioned that a M 550 could manage it, but the benchmarks from notebookcheck indicate the M 743 is somewhat worse (still far above an Atom though).
|
I would say no. The dual core Atoms are a bit faster than the Celery M 743 and still drop frames at normal bitrates from what it sounds like.
|
Quote:
|
It should handle 720p Hi10p fine.
btw, buying a laptop or something? |
Yeah, I'm trying. My current Dell Vostro 1500 is effectively stuck on my desk, and I want a small machine (<12") that I can actually carry around. So I'm stuck sorting through a bunch of underpowered and overpriced ones, and a whole lot of similarly-named processors that give no indication of actual ability. The other limitation is that any computer more powerful than my current one will replace it on my desk... and I won't be able to take it anywhere. :heh:
|
So it can't be faster than a Vostro 1500. Interesting performance requirement lol.
Why can't the laptop leave your desk? Seems weird. |
Quote:
|
You're looking at the wrong subnotebooks then. My Thinkpad X220 has the same CPU that larger laptops have. The EliteBook 2560p can even be modded to fit a quad core.
Anyways, budget? As for your problem with having to plug and unplug things. Have you considered a docking station? |
Wow, those are way out of my budget, $300 at most. Anyway, I've been looking on eBay and found some other Vostro models, so I think I'll just go for those if I see a good price. Thanks.
|
Quote:
Basically, it's not at all unreasonable to assume that for most applications, any i3/i5/i7 CPU will perform at the very least twice as well as a Celeron or Atom running at the same clock frequency; in some specific cases you're probably going to get absurd results on the order of 8-10 times better performance. Clock frequency stopped being relevant as a comparison metric between different CPU models many years ago. |
Quote:
|
Some very rough performance per clock numbers from H.264 decoding testing a while back (if my memory is right):
Core i7/i5/i3: ~1.25 Core 2 Penryn: 1.0 Pentium 4 and Atom: ~0.40 Cortex A8 (iPad/iPhone chip): ~0.28 |
Well, I just went and got a Fujitsu LifeBook T4220 off eBay for ~$300. With a 2.4Ghz Core 2 Duo, 4gb RAM, and 160gb HDD, except for the graphics it's slightly better than my Vostro 1500, so I'm sure it's up to the task. Thanks for the help, everybody.
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 21:22. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.