IIRC, that was sort of justified.
- No risk to life.
- It wasn't the first time he called them to put out a fire, but refused to pay the yearly fee.
- Firefighting costs money.
Oh, sure, when his house's on fire, he'll pay the 75 dollars. But that's not how insurance works.
(That's why I think firefighting should be mandatory and paid for by taxes. It's just a mess if you let people think they can do without.)
|