View Single Post
Old 2012-09-25, 15:12   Link #5361
KholdStare
ISML Technical Staff
*Graphic Designer
 
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Age: 35
Send a message via AIM to KholdStare Send a message via MSN to KholdStare
Quote:
Originally Posted by GDB View Post
But if they're unsure what it was, then they should have never called an unreviewable outcome. You call the catch or the interception, and then review it and see what happened. If it ends up being simultaneous at that point, THEN you call it that. You don't start there. Also, expect a lot of teams to just start abusing each other and basically forcing the new refs into uncomfortable spots now. They clearly don't know the rules, teams know it, and if Goodell won't bring back the real refs, expect some pain and injuries.
I totally agree with this. It was a bad call on the field. In fact, I never saw it called a simultaneous catch. I saw two different officials calling two different things at once (one didn't overrule the other) and somehow they never even stated what the original call on the field was before reviewing it. Terrible officiating.
KholdStare is offline   Reply With Quote