Quote:
Originally Posted by Firefly00
Too unprofessional for my tastes; there's no need to make a spectacle of it. Also, if you're going to do that, you have to be equally public in fessing up and eating crow if you get it wrong (i.e. false positive). Mark Jacobs, I think, had the right idea back in Warhammer: Age of Reckoning - the server-wide 'in-character' ban message ( reference). An example:
"Tchar’zanek has ordered the slaughter of SpammerNameHere and all others of his kind who weaken the Raven Host by providing wealth and power to the unworthy." |
Get it wrong? It was pretty obvious the person banned was a hacker from the video alone. I don't think they would make a spectacle of it without 100% certainty. He also did it to show proof that the hacker was in-fact banned, which is much better than simply taking their word for it.
Hackers deserve to be publicly humiliated on youtube.
