Quote:
Originally Posted by kuromitsu
But you say this because this is the only version that we know.
|
Yes, and this animated version is great to me, so I don't see any problems. I mean, I'm already satisfied by it (so far) like Ufotables' adaptation of
KnK or WIT's
Shingeki no Kyojin.
Quote:
Originally Posted by kuromitsu
And the characters being properly presented, if you don't mean it in an on/off model sense then it's again not a studio issue but a writing one.
|
I do mean it in a visual way.
Quote:
Originally Posted by kuromitsu
At what time?
|
When they are working on the anime. Didn't they do it in the studio?
Quote:
Originally Posted by kuromitsu
(I'm not sure how the publisher comes into the picture.)
|
You said it yourself:
"usually the publisher that pays most of the costs and calls most of the shots"
Quote:
Originally Posted by kuromitsu
The director has also worked on a bunch of shows for other studios, the head writer, the episode directors, the animation directors as well... They're not DEEN exclusive staff.
|
They were working
with DEEN, and some people like to simplify that by mentioning just DEEN as an "umbrella" to cover
the entire team in casual comments without any intention of being disrespectful to anyone who has worked on it. Again, you can't expect commenters to list all the members' names of the team in casual short comments outside of a (mini) review or essay or something like that. Mentioning just the studio is their way (aka. shortcut) to thank all that's involved.
Of course, there are (many) ignorant people out there like you said, but not all of them who only mentioned the studio's name are ignorant.
Quote:
Originally Posted by kuromitsu
But you don't know more either... The adaptation is in fact good, but it's selling the entire creative team short (including the producers, for that matter) by making it sound like it's all thanks to DEEN as if the people working on this show all belonged to the studio.
|
See my answers above.