Quote:
Originally Posted by Sethalak
I don't get one thing from the riddle of EP8:
Battler and Beatrice reason that the culprit of the first twillight could have killed the five others and then played dead. After that, he/she committed the 2. Twillight und was trapped in Natsuhis Room.
Battler and Beatrice said, that one of their children (Battler, George or Maria) must be one of the accomplices. And I don't get that thing. It is also possible, that there were two culprits of the first twillight: the first one commited four murders and then both played dead. After that, the same person killed Natsuhi and Krauss.
Afterwards, the accomplice (from the first twillight) could commit twillight 4 and so on.
I don't get why it must be one of the children??!
|
Only a culprit can lie with purple.
The children testified in purple that their parents were dead (therefore they weren't pretending to be dead). If one of the parents was pretending to be dead, the child lied and so he's an accomplice that either killed or will kill someone as well.