Quote:
|
Your two paragraphs contradict each other... again. Lelouch's true face isn't just a caring older brother, it is many different things with that just being a part of it. Nunally does not know the other faces, as such, you can't tell me that she knows who her brother is or is becoming. The simple fact that she only knows one side of Lelouch is a sign that they are drifting apart because Lelouch is changing while she is remaining Nunally.
|
They do not, I didn't say it was his only face, only his true one, that at his core he is the caring older brother. You'd have made that connection had you highlighted the last line of my second paragraph.
Quote:
|
What? How does the line "At the intersection of tomorrow and yesterday ~ For us who don’t come across each other" talk about bridging the present gap? Don't just tell me you take it to mean that, explain why you take it to mean that. What reasoning do you have to make a claim that this implies anything but seperation. For example, I've been basing my ideas around what Koshimizu presented in his very nice analysis of the OP.
|
The intersection between tomorrow and yesterday would be the present am I correct? And in that current time frame they are separated from each other, that doesn't speak for what will occur in the future however, as by my indication in the shooting star lines he's going to forward to reunite with her, which is in keeping with the plot as well. There's also the line of him going forward to fight now, since it came right afterwards the being separated segment I'll assume he's going to fight to get to her, but that the results of this battle are still not known. That's basically what we come back to Var, a clash that has yet to be determined, so I don't think we can make sudden declarations that they will continue to be separate, just as I try not to make any declarations that they will reunite as these two aspects will clash with each other, and we'll see the result from there I guess.
Quote:
|
And I'm going to stand by the point that some of your arguments are too if based and tend to stretch the meaning or truth of something far beyond a simple view. Occam's razor.
|
It's not like I can outright disagree with you're possibility, or say for a 100% that my version will happen, because even I'm unsure of what will occur in the end due to all the present elements. I make sure to acknowledge your points at least with my ifs so I think this counters making an overly general statement that things have been decided as such, and it's not like I don't bring up valid points of my own to support my views. All the reasons I've brought up thus far giving my simple view something more then that, it gives it credibility. And what the heck is an Occam's razor?
