Quote:
Originally Posted by Raiza Sunozaki
I can agree with this, but I'm still preferential to a pro-meta-fantasy take on things. But there is one flaw in your theory. He was able to revive Beatrice. Not the Beatrice he spent game after game battling with, but a Beatrice which is a perfect replica of her, in a sense, the ideal reincarnation of her. So how would that place in your theory?
|
When Beatrice was revived, Battler was still trapped in the logic error. So I don't think he was the one who revived Beatrice. It's just a metaphor for how Beatrice's style of writing came back after it was lost.
It's even pretty obvious when you compare their fighting styles. Battler tried to fight Erika by seemingly creating a logical contradiction (like Nanjo's murder in EP3), yet having an actual solution. But that strategy was really risky, and he accidentally created the logic error because he couldn't think of a solution. Compared to that, Beatrice refused to repeat a lot of things in red on the basis that "she did it with magic". That was something that Battler didn't say even once. And that's the main difference between their fighting styles. Battler acknowledged too much with the red in an attempt to confuse Erika, but ended up confusing himself. Beatrice didn't repeat reds that could be explained with magic to keep Erika guessing.