Quote:
Originally Posted by wingzerosnuggles
There's also the issue of introducing new background info fifteen years after Episode Zero established itself as the definitive prequel. He's treading dangerous ground and could potentially retcon himself. Heck, he already has. Preventer 5 can't be canon in the FT timeline. Fine, introduce new stuff but retconing something that's been there for 15 years? I was already peeved at the whole "Dr. J survived past the last episode" thing.
|
I didn't like Dr.J surviving either but what Sumizawa has done isn't much different than what Tomino did with the Zeta movie trilogy.
Retcons are bound to happen after a story is revived many years later. And while Preventer 5 can't be considered canon if FT is, have any plot-points from Episode Zero been contradicted?