Quote:
Originally Posted by bladeofdarkness
Lelouch sees Mao's geass active
the geass symbol seems to be a visible thing
and again, Lelouch can prove he cant switch it off by showing that he has contact lenses to cover it up
and can show that he can give orders to someone without them reacting to it (if they were geassed before)
if you keep trying to nitpick there would NEVER be a perfect way ever
but the fact that the test suggested would WORK and is very possible, means that Lelouch has a very good way of proving he didnt use his geass on them
P.S
2&3 being after the betrayal is irrelevent, sicne the test is proposed to take place AFTER lelouch takes over britannia
|
Number 2 & 3 were about Villetta being the one to come up with it. But as expected from you at this point, you just come in to the topic and type whatever rolls off your mind even if they aren't related to the subject at hand.
As for the seeing Geass part, I lost the part when copying the quotes around where I wanted to say that only those with Geass or Codes have ever been shown to see other people's geass. No normal person has ever been shown noticing a geass in an eye.
As for nitpicking? Maybe that was the point to show how too easily you guys make it sound in that he could convince them. Basically from what you guys say, I could take a gun, fill it with blanks, and tell everyone "Hey look, this guns doesn't hurt people when I shoot it." I try it out for them, and later, I put real bullets in it. That is how Lelouch's geass is. The BK don't know what powers geass (bullets), they just know it is fired (like out of the barrel of the gun.) However, you can't dissect Lelouch's head and show that he is telling the truth about the limitations, just like if you don't get your hands on the gun I demonstrated, you can't get it open to see if it is properly put together or if the bullets were blank or not.
P.S.: I'm sorry nitpicking means going against your over simplistic 'peace' ideas.