Quote:
Originally Posted by GoldenLand
I wouldn't mind making a game of it, but I think that having to follow the Rosatrice theory as stated by jTiKey or KnM is too restrictive to be properly fun making up theories for (ie: with George and Nanjo as mandatory accomplices and nobody else, and Rosa's motive being insanity and a resurrection ceremony, and so on). If Rosatrice were defined as just any Rosa-culprit gameboard then that would be a bit easier. But I suppose that's not the point, you're wanting an orderly discussion of the particular Rosatrice theory which has been put forward. That might not be so bad. I could stick to arguing against the theories by checking them against Knox, Dine, and what's humanly possible.
|
Yes, we'll go nowhere if we keep on arguing over red, Knox and Dine and instead I think it could be interesting to discuss over the thing and try it from another perspective.
Quote:
Originally Posted by GoldenLand
Speaking of games, it might be fun to look through the twilights of the games under the assumption that identity/role death might apply to anyone and everyone and see if it makes any difference.
|
I agree! This also could be fun!
Although I think we've to work the rules for this game well or we'll end up going into chaos as there's a lot to discuss.