Quote:
Originally Posted by DonQuigleone
|
I'll be blunt: I see nothing fundamentally wrong with those contracts except they might not be socially acceptable and inefficient investing. Furthermore, while we do have the issue of having minors sign contracts, I find that the potential abuse from exploiting those of majority age when they attempt to break into the idol industry to be of greater threat.
Of course, the fact that I run myself pretty harsh might taint my views, but I have to ask this fundamental question: What industry is NOT like this, supposing things are as bad as some of the less sensational news providers say they are? The way I see it is that people are only focusing on the visible targets while ignoring the everyday abuses that happens everywhere else.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DonQuigleone
|
Ah yes, the social justification condition. I can't believe that a professor of constitutional and labor law can actually make the mistake of using a personal opinion and attempting to use an irrelevant court ruling to justify that personal opinion.
Quote:
Originally Posted by erneiz_hyde
Hey, I was merely asking how much truth exist in there, not that I'm asserting it.
|
Nah, I didn't mean it in a negative sense. Just surprised you would bring that topic up when we're having a small tempest in the thread.
Quote:
Originally Posted by erneiz_hyde
How serious is serious then? The reason I felt that dating=sex isn't all that far from truth is that the act of dating itself can be considered a somewhat serious relationship there.
|
You've basically hit the target. Unless both parties know it's supposed to not be serious, a relationship is supposed to be serious.
Quote:
Originally Posted by erneiz_hyde
As a note, I'm asking this because I just recently read molester man and there the protagonist seems to imply that history of dating=history of sex.
|
I would need to read it before coming to any conclusions, since I don't know what kind of person the protagonist is.