View Single Post
Old 2007-03-21, 19:57   Link #31
Onizuka-GTO
Holy Beast ~Wuff!~
*Scanlator
 
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Leeds, UK
Age: 41
Send a message via MSN to Onizuka-GTO
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hypernova View Post
Is it just me or are all the weights given on the KF's horribly out of scale? A M1 Abrams weighs 63 tonnes. There's no way that KF's only weigh a few tonnes unless they are plastic. They gotta be at least 20 tonnes.

Just thoght of something too, if KF's came about due to a need to attach legs to tank escape pods. Why aren't we seeing legs on the KF's escape pods.
KF's are lighter then MBT, why do you think the Glasgow KF's used during the Japanese invasion, had anti-tank bazooka/recoiless rifle attachment when facing fully armoured tanks? even the sunderlands KF still used the shoulder mounted heavy weapons, as witnessed in the attack against the JLF HQ.

The KF sacrifice armour and pure mass for mobility and agility.

KF has a better advantage in Urban situation, can be deployed more esily, and yet still can fulfil the capacity the modern MBT can.
__________________
Onizuka-GTO is offline   Reply With Quote