Quote:
I think I believe in this: http://courtofillusions.wordpress.co...9-level-truth/
I’ll be damned if I agree to George being the culprit of the story. It’s far too third-rate!!
There was an interesting notion that while George is good at martial arts, most of the murders are done with guns. It could just be to hide the real culprit though.
I'm not entirely denying it.
George would sometimes be an accomplice, because of Shannon. I thought he could be a culprit in EP3 too, because Eva-Beatrice is basically Eva's greed which she pushed onto George, by her own words. If Eva-Beatrice hints at George's motive, and some of his darker nature was shown in EP4, there is still some basis to suspect him. Remember, if we got all the evidence only in EP6, that's too late for all of the crucial hints being given in EP4.
|
Those arguments in that blog are really, really bad.
Most of his points are flat-out wrong. Like George having no occult knowledge.
Quote:
|
Yes, but does he actually have a proper motive?
|
Yes. Assuming Rokkenjima prime and Yasu being Shannon, there are many, many motives you could come up with.
Also Jesus Christ, that blog you are using as evidence makes some of the worst arguments I have ever seen. I know the mods want us to calm down, so I must state I'm not trying to be rude. It's just that it's seriously awful reasoning.
http://courtofillusions.wordpress.co...move/#more-807
Look at that bastardization of the rules. First of all, the writer seems to be trying to use a misguided version of the Socratic method to prove his point.
His first argument is that the story doesn't follow Van Dine's rules. Congratulations Mr.Author, welcome to episode 5.
Now that we are past that, let's go to his ''brilliant'' argument. BECAUSE OBSERVERS MAY LET THEIR CONCLUSIONS BE HEARD, THEN IT DOESN'T MATTER IF THEY ARE DENIED IN RED.
Very well. Now let's put this claim to a test:
"Because I can claim anything and say it out loud, it has the right to be a possibility, even if it's impossible given the game's context."
Test #1:
Michael Bay is the culprit. He killed everyone. He was filming an overly realistic film. His accomplice was Kinzo. They are friends. This was foreshadowed by the fact that they are both insane. This explains the over the top special effects, the explosion at the end, and the re-shootings known as episodes.
Test #2:
I claim that Jim Carrey is the killer.
See how ridiculous his argument is? It makes no sense. Moreover, his analysis of the Van Dine rules are just not very good.