Quote:
Originally Posted by GundamFan0083
By last paragraph, were you referring to this:
|
Sorry about that... I had to pause three times before I could hit submit for that post and then had to run. Anyway, I was referring to the last paragraph from the first page of that article where it says:
"On top of that, some budget experts believe not every part of the health care law could be repealed using the simple-majority rules of reconciliation — only the parts that have a direct budget impact. Still, major portions, including the individual mandate, could be targeted by reconciliation."
With that said, I don't know if you had the pleasure of watching Face the Nation yesterday (Sunday) where John Boehner braves a few questions about the aftermath of a successful "repeal." There seems to be no planning for what they will "replace" it with other than reverting the clock to how it used to be. Power to the insurance companies.
Quote:
|
Roberts did more than just that, he limited government power considerably since he deemed a mandate an overreach. How this plays out in the future remains to be seen, but it in no way prevents or restricts a repeal of this law.
|
Unfortunately, there is always two sides of the coin. It might be a good thing to an extent, but in the same breath, the negative aspect is also out there for the taking. SeijiSensei posted briefly about it above from one point of view.