Quote:
Originally Posted by SaintessHeart
From the perspective of Darwinism, killing off the "weak and incapable" serves to weed out those who are not strong enough for the changes within the passage of time.
Then again, the could kill us all off because humanity as a species must work together to survive and live.
|
Now you are definitely confused. You don't need wars to kill the weak and incapable; Darwinism dictates that there is no need to control a self-sustaining system.
The people who use Darwinism as an argument for wars, are
not trying to kill the weak or incapable; they are trying to kill people they personally don't like. Now, since the people who try that tend to die horribly themselves, the argument seem to be that manipulating Darwinism is a lost cause. Anyone who is truly weak or incapable would die on their own. And if you have trouble killing them, by that logic they are not as weak as you say they are.