Quote:
Originally Posted by Vallen Chaos Valiant
Now you are definitely confused. You don't need wars to kill the weak and incapable; Darwinism dictates that there is no need to control a self-sustaining system.
The people who use Darwinism as an argument for wars, are not trying to kill the weak or incapable; they are trying to kill people they personally don't like.
|
There is an element of truth to that, there are always theories and perspectives that one race is superior to another. Usually it happens during an economic boom and the majority race in that country simply get blinded by their successes.
So now let's assume that they are correct, and that their increase in GDP in a short period of time is due to their race's superior intelligence and strength.........
Quote:
|
Now, since the people who try that tend to die horribly themselves, the argument seem to be that manipulating Darwinism is a lost cause. Anyone who is truly weak or incapable would die on their own. And if you have trouble killing them, by that logic they are not as weak as you say they are.
|
You will always have trouble killing something at this stage of human evolution and technological advancement. Think of it as quality-control from a manufacturing perspective, except that you are now manufacturing sentient humans who are capable of thinking for themselves. It is simply that the product is "not perfect enough" and still requires fine-tuning, but the batch produced is too large to be destroyed without cost and consequence.
From a cardinal perspective they are still the weaker ones, and it is just more filtering to be done.
P.S I am looking at this perspective from a devil's advocate point of view. I am not, by any means, a facist or a racist.