Quote:
Originally Posted by Judoh
In the same scene though EVA mentions how she's pushing it all on George, and says it as if he already exists at the time. So there are some inconsistencies in the statements of this scene.
|
Which actually supports the variant where the heirship hijack plan is an artefact and does not actually exist. Which sounds the most plausible to me from that list -- there's other problems with what EVA is saying, like her statements to Rosa that they were 'small together' when there's a minimum of 12 years worth age gap.
But there has to be something underneath that whole mess that is true, for reasonably small values of 'true'. Can we recover that?