View Single Post
Old 2008-02-17, 22:53   Link #16
TheFluff
Excessively jovial fellow
 
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: ISDB-T
Age: 37
Urgh. Talk about how you good you are at AFX all you want but the fact is that you're trying to redefine a word with a well-known meaning. Don't do that. A more conventional definition can be found here: http://aegisub.cellosoft.com/docs/Typesetting

Edit: after reading the post in its entirety, it seems more like some sort of style guide for sign typesetters. Okay, that's fine but I don't see why you have to try to redefine parts of the standard English vocabulary to do it. I also don't see why people are so eager to say that karaoke and/or logos aren't typesetting. It's presentation of textual material, how can it not be typesetting?

Edit2: apparently this turned into a typesetter circlejerking thread.
__________________
| ffmpegsource
17:43:13 <~deculture> Also, TheFluff, you are so fucking slowpoke.jpg that people think we dropped the DVD's.
17:43:16 <~deculture> nice job, fag!

01:04:41 < Plorkyeran> it was annoying to typeset so it should be annoying to read

Last edited by TheFluff; 2008-02-17 at 23:05.
TheFluff is offline   Reply With Quote