Quote:
Originally Posted by 0utf0xZer0
So why is 1080P24 considered so good for film then? Just because it's the native frame rate of most film?
|
Exactly, there simply are no 48fps films (analogue/digital base material). Therefore 1080P24 is the best you can get from the analogue/digital material. 24fps is the technical limit for such devices these days.
But a completely rendered thing, like a video game can produce the 48fps. Then you could decide if you want 48fps half frames or 24fps full frames. In this case the half frames would optically beat the full frames, at least at high resolutions.
Yet normal analogue TV has true 60/50 fps half frames, which makes the matter a little confusing. Most TV cameras have true 60/50 fps half frames. But any adaption of a movie film will just be a bad compromise interlaced, since its based on 24 fps material.