Quote:
Originally Posted by ipodi
This speaks nothing about Satsuki's professionalism.
|
Yes, it does.
A professional reviewer's
real bosses are the readership. That's especially true in the internet age.
Quote:
|
The publication is unprofessional, not the person.
|
Both are unprofessional, in this instance, in my opinion.
Quote:
|
What readers want is irrelevant to how professional one is.
|
I totally disagree.
Quote:
|
The paparazzi's analogy is apt in the sense that Satuski is doing a unsavory job but is following all the rules. So she is professional.
|
No, she's not. One of the
core rules of a reviewer is, you know, to actually take in (watch, visit, etc...) whatever it is that they're reviewing.
Quote:
|
Not "feeling bad" about your job is not a parental failure. Driving your kids to do drugs and abusing your kids are failures. Let's not blow this trivial oversight over the proportion.
|
It's not trivial when it becomes a continuous problem.
No it's not.
Do all of us have to personally be employed in politics in order to legitimately object to corruption in government?
Of course not.
You're setting a ridiculous standard, in my view.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ipodi
The dialogue in Ep. 11 quite clearly states that the motivation to write a unflattering review comes directly from the higher-ups in the publication.
|
A person can have multiple motivations for one act.