Quote:
Originally Posted by Kylon99
I think Renall's just talking about things from a legal stand point. Specifically criminal culpability or civil liability.
You're talking about whether he's morally or ethically responsible, right? I don't think anyone would disagree that he was those two and is technically to share some of the blame. And also, possibly negligent and/or naive...
... wouldn't put it past Kinzo. *cough*  |
Then let's talk from a legal standpoint.
Suppose this case: there was a terrorist attack, a bomb exploded in a public area killing several people in the process. Two men are found being involved with this case. One man is responsible for acquiring the explosive, creating the bomb and the remote control, and placing the device on the site. The other man is responsible for pressing the trigger.
From a perfectly legal standpoint, do you think that only the man that actually pulled the trigger will be considered accountable for that massacre?