So I'm just supposed to accept that you're contradicting the definition of determinism you gave to begin with?
My personal disagreement is more a matter of the logical form of your claims rather than the content itself. I'm not going to press you any further on this, but let me just say a lot of it reads to me like: "A is B and A is not B".
Unless you mean that the "one possible outcome" you referred early on doesn't take the soul into account just yet?
__________________
"There’s an up higher than up, but at the very top, down is all there is."
|