View Single Post
Old 2010-07-05, 03:12   Link #12840
Kylon99
Senior Member
 
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Meta-Meta-Meta-Space
Quote:
Originally Posted by Smeckledorf View Post
I already gave my answer for this... twice or three times now, the game has rules and following the rules would result in a normal, logical game. However, a logic error results with something is wrong with the game. So, I would say episode 6 had an additional logic error that was not pointed out before.

Edit: Further proof of Van Dine's already applied rules would be episode 5. Knox's Decalogue states nothing about there being only one detective, yet Battler could not be a detective because there already was one.
Sorry no, you can't prove that all the rules are being followed by showing that one rule has been followe in once instance. That's not a logical statement. You need to show that all of the rules haven't been broken. We'll leave that as an exercise for the other posters.

But, I'm not sure what you mean by a 'logical error.' That has nothing to do with the number of detectives unless you're trying to say that yes, Episode 6 is broken and does not follow the Van Dine rules.
Kylon99 is offline   Reply With Quote