Quote:
Originally Posted by Obelisk ze Tormentor
You know what’s ironic? Roland Emmerich’s movie would actually be decent if it didn’t use Godzilla as its title.
|
Exactly. It was actually a good monster movie. The creature's design was even cool. But
don't call it Godzilla. That just chucks the whole thing down the drain.
Well, Toho got the last laugh in the end.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Obelisk ze Tormentor
No. Since the first movie (in 1950s), Godzilla was already "equipped" with "atomic breath". Furthermore, in subsequent sequels, he can "charge" his atomic breath before releasing it (like particle canons in sci-fi movies). IIRC Godzilla never breathes fire (he's a mutated dinosaur, not a dragon).
|
Although it doesn't always look the same; in the first two it looked more gaseous (0:40)