Quote:
Originally Posted by KrimzonStriker
Well, that hole is thrown into question just because we never actually see from the distance, we know it hits but right afterward we pan out and back while he follows up and shoots himself. If you're talking about scene intention however Tael then I have to ask the same in which the whole scene with the cart driver amongst other things plays into this in comparison. Any, as said before, the ending seems to be open to a variety of interpretation and as such I will take Sunrise and Taniguichi up on that invitation as I have said before  |
No. There is no Geass rewiring. Every time the Geass has worked that has occurred, every time. The only thing that could make Charles special enough to not have the effect is if it had no affect at all. It doesn't matter if we pan out or not, there is no sign of him being Geassed
ever. You cannot argue that he was Geassed if the very fundamental parts of Geassing never occurred. It's like arguing Person A died because Person B fired a gun. If Person A isn't shown taking the bullet, how can you argue that he died because of Person B?
Then why was the crane in the middle of the focus? I'm pretty sure panning up to the crane, with the crane then being focused on a few seconds later, puts the crane at a higher importance than a hat. There is nothing to substantiate that it is Lelouch, nothing concrete anyway.