Quote:
Originally Posted by CrowKenobi
So, you're implying that the critics can say whatever they want, but when someone calls them on the carpet, they're the "bad guy?" 
When the reply to the critic is nonsensical, then by all means, that could be true, but should a poster who uses the facts, sarcasm and wit to debunk a critic's post be labeled the same way? (especially when he wins the argument and the critic is left sputtering a reply...)
 |
No, I'm saying those who continue to complain about a posters negative stubborness on a topic are just as faulty for "fueling the fire" when the option of ignoring it is always there... especially when the points they bring up to defend their show are just as repetitive as the critiques.
And yes, a poster who uses facts, sarcasm, and wit to debunk a critic to silence doesn't deserve to be labeled a villain... but I've yet to see such a feat occur.
It's no easy task to change someone's opinions, as such we're all stuck in this little game in which we're all big fat losers.