Quote:
Originally Posted by Kona
Variety is better than not adding any characters. Not all OP characters have the same amount of moves like Luffy and Zoro has. There is only so much you can work with when characters have little to none moves. Now if they have a DF you can work with more. Which characters lack depth exactly?
Of course they are going to leave out some stuff for a sequel. Still doesn't change anything about the first game having no content. You have to make up on other parts of the game which they didn't do.
|
Exactly. Not all characters have the same amount of moves that Luffy and Zoro have displayed, for example. Therefore, what would be the point of putting in a character that's shown almost nothing? Generic moves would have to be made up for that character, which would compromise how much time the developers can spend on characters that have shown lots of moves. When developers have more time to focus on less things, depth is added. Larger roster doesn't necessarily equate to an increase in quality.
The first game had adequate content for being the first in a series. It gave the developers enough in reserve to add to this game.
And on that note, I'm done with this discussion. Your complaints all revolve around "quantity", and you don't understand the concept of "balance" with regards to "quality".