Quote:
Originally Posted by Sute443
1. Current evidence suggests that the expansion of the universe is accelerating due to dark energy, which would result in a Big Rip rather than a Big Crunch.
2. The cycling of universes you describe is close enough to the third possibility that it falls into the same category, with the same solution.
|
1. Realy? Well, whatever
It doesn't help in the discussion (thanks for the info)
2.I know. I have some difficultys reading long complex english texts. So I was reading and replying one "block" by time. Sorry.
Quote:
|
Let me try to rephrase myself. The "everything was created 5 minutes ago, even the contradictory evidence" theory is not testable to a sufficient extent that results contradicting it could not be handwaved away. This means that no actionable knowledge can be drawn from considering the possibility. Thus, entertaining it is a waste of time and energy.
|
I I didn't understand the undelined text. Blame my poor english skils
.
Anyway you meant that since it can not be proven, it is pointless debate about it right? I agree. Just pointing that it is not (totally) meaningless.
Quote:
|
I dunno. It's been a while since I read BLR and I didn't watch the subs for it, either.
|
The subs diverge a lot... Baka-tsuki says:
Quote:
|
"As there is no conclusion to the paradox theory, there is no way to prove that there is no paradox."
|
As an "explanation" to the events of that Tanabata. I was amused that your words fit pretty well here.
Well, I guess we are just agreeing by now.