Quote:
Originally Posted by kyp275
I do believe that example gets my point across, which again is that there is no inherent value in how early or late something happens in a story, which as far as I can see is what you're arguing for - that "xxxxx" is better because it happened earlier in the novel as you read it due to the way the novel is structured, which is something that a chronological adaptation change, even though it does not change when it actually took place in the story itself.
|
Except, there
IS value in how early it happens. One of the first and foremost values being that it was unique timing that we only see 3% of the time (if even that), which made SAO stand out, instead of it using the same old recipe.
Quote:
In other words, what you're saying is that "xxxxx" is better simply because it's shown in episode 3 instead of 9.
|
If you're saying it like
that, then you don't really understand my point, and didn't properly read or understand my novel thread post that I linked.