It does seem to be a case of lack of common sense. It's certainly a controversial issue we have here, but seriously. Would cartoon images of pre-teen girls in revealing outfits or doing rather raunchy acts instigate that the material is child pornography? Real, maybe, but just because someone in an apartment somewhere might actually jack off to this stuff, doesn't mean a blanket ban should be placed. Lolita should be legal, I don't see a problem with that.
__________________
"That bus! It has an awesome ring to it!"
|