2011-09-10, 02:27 | Link #24321 | ||
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
|
Quote:
Quote:
The Eva Ushiromiya that went to Rokkenjima and the Eva Ushiromiya that returned from the island are not the same person. As was pointed out earlier in the discussion, is it not convenient that the message bottles presumably written by the culprit throw all blame at himself, the person that is now considered dead? Also, in order to reinforce this kind of reasoning, parallels to And Then There Were None are invoked in the messages. Would it not be perfect if the culprit 'died' and became somebody else? What I'm aiming for is, 'The Eva Ushiromiya that returned from Rokkenjima is, in fact, Yasu.' It has been pointed out that neither Ange nor Okonogi would fall for that. Okonogi (who also, curiously, knows the 'Without love, it cannot be seen.' phrase) could've been bought off from further investigation by the gold. Ange might've been too distant from Eva in the past to be sure something is wrong. She did feel something was odd, as noted in the quoted parts above. 'Eva' eventually fakes her death and becomes yet another person (maybe she had already played this role whenever she had time?), that is, Ikuko. Ikuko keeps writing in such a way that would further throw blame onto Shkanon, if solved. This whole theory is based on the existence of Shkanon shenanigans (a person capable of playing the role of a nonexistent member of the opposite sex coupled with personality tricks) and Kinzo's title trick. |
||
2011-09-10, 02:43 | Link #24322 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Meta-Meta-Meta-Space
|
How about this instead:
The Ushiromiya Tooya/Battler that we see... is actually YASU! Battler was the one who really died in the ocean and Beatrice-Yasu survived. But when she awoke she had no memories. When she recovered what she thought were memories, she had actually ended up recovering her narrative of what Battler was doing and what he was like. Why does Ikuko mistake Yasu for Battler? Because Yasu's gender was unknown but when she awoke as Battler she self-identified as a male Battler. This solves the issue (the fan-raised shipping issue albeit) of why the narratives dance around Tooya and Ikuko's relationship; because Tooya can't perform. This can explain why Tooya was able to solve Umineko from just two stories. This can explain why Tooya knew so much about Kinzo (since Yasu inherited the position.) This can explain why Tooya was able to continue on with the stories... etc... etc... いかが皆さん?Kylonはこの程度の推理が可能です! ... anyone? 8) <watches the tumbleweeds roll by...> |
2011-09-10, 02:47 | Link #24323 | ||
The True Culprit
|
Quote:
There is no way she could've been both Eva and Ikuko, as Ikuko finds Battler pretty much immediately, and she would have to take care of Ange and Toya pretty much fulltime while running Eva's businesses (Until Ange is sent off to boarding school, of course). Also, the Hachijou residence seems to be quite a drive from wherever Eva had been staying, judging by EP6's 1998 narrative. Quote:
__________________
|
||
2011-09-10, 03:06 | Link #24324 | |
Goat
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Gnawing away at Rokkenjima
|
Quote:
what is presented. EDIT: Also, when they reunite, Touya's memories of Ange are vivid and accurate. Last edited by Wanderer; 2011-09-10 at 03:45. |
|
2011-09-10, 09:58 | Link #24326 | ||||
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
|
Quote:
However my knowledge of the scene isn't first hand so, as I said, my theory is weak. A better way to know when black text is reliable. It provides Meta Ange background. It also helps in building up the meeting between Meta Ange and Featherine and the plot of Ep 8 and give us some info. It implies Ange disappeared at some point and was possibly assumed death, which in the real world might have pushed Toya to face his own fears and try to remember... I think it's also natural Toya would have wondered about Ange and what she was doing, willingly or unwillingly. All the info we have about the future come from Ange's story, from her memory and her quest for the truth. I think this is one of the purposes of Ange's story existance. Also, it makes possible to present Ange as a person with more than one future (dying on Rokkenjima, killing Amakusa and the captain on the boat, becoming a writer and later meeting up with Toya) because they would be mere speculations from Toya reflecting his fears and hopes. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I can make some theories for this but I would really prefer to read the scene first so I could check there are no contraddictions... |
||||
2011-09-10, 10:46 | Link #24327 | |||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
Spoiler for Umineko 8 Ending:
I'd still say that this is a fairly good indicator that Yasu and all his creations died on that day, but I see how it is debatable, as the ending only speaks of "the witch" and not of a certain girl in general. But there are two other scenes in the ending of Episode 8 (before the Tea Party and ????). One is the scene where Featherine casts a golden flower to the ocean after Ikuko (on the press conference as Tôya) decided not to release Eva's diary to the public. She said that this would create so much doubt and unrest in the Rokkenjima fan community that after some time it would come to a rest. And while it might not die completely, at least it means a little rest for the dead. And then Featherine cast out that rose and the narration was this: "Featherine threw one single flower, a golden rose to the sea. It was a parting gift*(1) to the peacefully sleeping cat box. It was meant to carry the story of that golden rose...and to become a period*(2) for that long tale." *(1): though I translated it as parting gift, the original word means something like "a tribute or an offering to the spirit of somebody who is about to depart to the netherworld". *(2): in this case it means a full stop, an absolute end to a sentence or a piece. I always read this as Ikuko actually rewriting how Tôya described Battler's escape from the island in order to give them a happy ending. She basically made it possible that Battler remains with Beatrice and becomes happy and still Battler's body makes it back to the world of the living. This is also nicely underlined in the following sequence on October 6th, where from the point he is floating upwards it is referred to as "Battler's body" and no longer Battler. I don't know but somehow this scene would feel a little bit wrong if Ikuko was Yasu. Even though of course Ikuko=Featherin=Yasu is not necessarily true then, it's kind of weird for me to imagine that on the one hand she would love him enough to wish for such an ending and on the other hand to completely let him go. Though of course this is personal bias to a great deal. The other scene is the moment when Ange has passed the gate and the bridging place between the capital of books (図書の都) and the world of Rokkenjima starts to crumble. First it is that they have to close the door. It is especially mentioned by Featherine that this door was constructed so that it needs two people: "Featherine: '...to close this door. ...Certainly, there is a certain manner when closing this door, right?!' Evatrice: 'Yeah, that's right. ...the rule that this door can not be closed unless two people do it.'" And it is not Battler and Featherine who close the door, it is Battler and Eva-Beatrice, who he definitely adresses as Aunt Eva, even asking her to take care of Ange in the future. Also, when the capital and the world of Rokkenjima are splitting apart, there is another line that definitely mentions the owners of the Rokkenjima illusion: "(speaking of how it seems like the world is crumbling)But that was not it. Battler's and EVA's, the world of those two, was being cut off from the capital of books." The world of Rokkenjima is definitely regarded as Battler's and Eva's world, Beatrice is merely a bystander in that sequence. She fullfilled her role when it came to posing the question wether it is all magic or all a trick. This, I think, is a strong hint towards Yasu actually not surviving the incident or at least not having anything to do with the illusion that Battler and Eva created after the incident. Quote:
The problem is that the lowest inheritance tax is 10% which is for everything below 1.000.000Yen. If it surpasses 300.000.000Yen it is taxed as high as 50%. Of course most people want to circumvent that tax and so they solve it by that manner of transfer. This is also why it is so important for the Kinzô illusion to stand and another point why they could easily blackmail Krauss with that proposition. Basically everything would have been for naught if that actually came to light. Even the epitaph game would practically be worth nothing. Also it is practically obvious that Krauss lost all of Kinzô's investments, so with everything said and done they would probably end up with nothing at all after taxes and debts are payed off. So finding the gold is especially important because it is outside of any legal mechanisms. Quote:
Spoiler for map:
I estimated the place of the Hachijô residence by the only other ferry to Nijima except the one right at Tôkyô harbour. And considering that their drive there was said to have taken some time, I'd assume that it is reasonable to assume it is located around Shimoda. By car it would take between 3 and 4 hours from Tôkyô to Shimoda. This would also make it less unlikely that Battler was cast to the shore close to Ikuko's residence. |
|||
2011-09-10, 11:08 | Link #24328 | ||||
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
|
Quote:
Quote:
Although it would have been annoying for the siblings to give up to such a big portion they would still inherit a big amount. Quote:
All Kinzo would have to do is to declare to the police he had incidentally 'found' the gold once he bought Rokkenjima. If no one can counter his claim showing he is the legittimate owner or that he had warned the police he was missing some gold, after a while it would be assumed the real owner gave up on his ownership of the gold and this would make Kinzo the legittimate new owner. Kinzo should probably have to pay taxes about it but this would be all. Of course pre requisites would be: Japan having the same laws as us, the Italian government were to assume the gold had gone lost or have no idea it existed so it couldn't claim it and that the Japanese government had no idea what happened on Rokkenjima... an idea that can be supported by the fact they sold to Kinzo an island with a military base and lot of explosive. Damn, it's difficult to reason on legal matters when laws are different... -_- Quote:
Now, is it okay to discuss about Yasu's position in the Rokkenjima incident? Assuming she only sent the letter in which she challenged the family to solve the epitaph and then had the discussion with the siblings in Ep 7 Tea Party, can she be held accountable for something? True, she said she would have killed them all if they didn't solve the epitaph but in the end she didn't (at least she didn't in Ep 7 Tea Party). It's also true she showed them the guns and how the bomb worked but she didn't really suggest them to chot each other. So, if Yasu had survived to the 'incident', would the police still be able to accuse her of something? Would Eva or any of the victims' relatives? |
||||
2011-09-10, 11:53 | Link #24329 | |||
BUY MY BOOK!!!
Join Date: May 2009
|
Quote:
She can counter that he was already dead, of course, but then it doesn't look so good for her that he just happens to be dead and she just happens to be the sole survivor. Quote:
The gold was then transferred by a military operation and placed in the custody of an allied military. There's really no way it ever legally and technically left the possession of the Japanese government, so the Japanese government is obligated to return it (to Italy or to whoever it was stolen from in Europe) and they don't need Kinzo's permission to do it. That's part of why he had to alter the stamp and hide it. The best argument you could make is that the gold belonged to the RSI and was transferred to the government of Imperial Japan. Neither of those nations still exist, replaced by the Republic of Italy and State of Japan respectively. This argument, however, doesn't really square with generally accepted international law. For all intents and purposes, Italy assumed the assets and debts of Northern Italy at the end of WW2 and the terms of surrender for Japan pretty much officially kept them the same entity, just with a new Constitution. And none of that matters if the gold was stolen from private citizens, because then it didn't actually belong to the RSI in the first place. If it does belong to private citizens, though, Kinzo might be able to keep it in fact while a massive lawsuit happens. This assumes the Japanese government doesn't care to step in. Basically the people it was taken from in Europe (or their heirs) would have to go sue Kinzo, which probably wouldn't come to much. Kinzo technically wouldn't be able to use the gold while it's tied up in court proceedings, but he may still be able to use it as collateral if Japanese lenders think the chance of the gold actually going back to Europe is low (and it probably would be). Quote:
Yasu sends a letter threatening the family if they don't solve the epitaph. This could be argue to be a game, but it could also be a threat if somebody honestly thought she'd do it. She then showed them the bomb and gave them the guns. At this point, the adults are the ones committing the actual murders. Basically, Eva could probably get her charged as an accessory, and I suppose you could make a case for murder itself if Eva believes Yasu set the bomb. It's not a hard case to make:
Even if that weren't provable, Eva can easily argue to a prosecutor that Yasu attempted to murder her with the bomb. It failed, because Eva found out about it and fled, but she clearly intended to kill Eva and took a step to try to kill Eva by arming the bomb. Of course if you're Yasu's attorney you have several easy arguments here:
__________________
|
|||
2011-09-10, 14:18 | Link #24330 | ||||||
Goat
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Gnawing away at Rokkenjima
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
And just a side comment- Evatrice was pretty awesome in episode 8. And that scene where Ange called Eva "mom" really got me... Quote:
|
||||||
2011-09-10, 23:49 | Link #24331 |
a.k.a. Akari_House
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Somewhere near Seattle
Age: 53
|
One observation, forgive me if someone else has noted it before. While most folks have commented on the meaning of Ikuko, what about this:
Yasu > can be romanized as "Yas" to drop the "u"* > YAShiro Ikuko (romanized). This only works in romaji, but we know how R07 is with that sort of thing... (* in fact, "YAS" is how the Gundam character designer YASUhiko Yoshikazu signs his name with romaji characters)
__________________
|
2011-09-11, 07:27 | Link #24332 | |
Senior Member
|
Quote:
My reason for that is, that Beatrice is portrayed as dying on October 6th 1986. Therefore Ikuko providing her as a gamemaster in the future seems strange when it is actually mentioned that things that died once cannot be revived in the same form again. Wether Yasu actually lost her memory and became Ikuko (which is unreasonable because she'd need knowledge of her possibilities to create Ikuko) or cast Beatrice away, both would mean a definitive death of her Beatrice persona. I think it is still mentionable that the gamemaster Beatrice in EP3 and 4 was slightly different in her behaviour compared to EP1 and 2. She actually started caring and the main antagonists are no longer her but Eva-Beatrice and Goldsmith respectively. Though she is still portrayed as controlling the field, she no longer acts as a controlling force on the field (in EP3 she is even portrayed as losing controll of her powers). So my idea is still that meta-Beatrice is just a projection of what Tôya pieced together from the message bottles and the memory he had of possible encounters with Yasu on the island. It is basically a disguise for the memories within him, which are best personified by the antagonist in the stories that triggered the memory in the first place. Battler probably has all necessary knowledge, Tôya just can't access them. I don't think this would actually work in this case, as the name's official reading is given as Hachijô and not Yashiro. I think it is even attached with Ruby at some point in the novel during EP6. |
|
2011-09-11, 07:30 | Link #24333 |
別にいいけど
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: forever lost inside a logic error
|
Needless to say it, I agree with Haguruma.
Beatrice is dead, she should remain dead. If she were still alive, all the good dramatic scenes would turn into a bad taste joke. BTW nice avatar of Jessica Beatrice Fletcher.
__________________
|
2011-09-11, 08:02 | Link #24334 | |
a.k.a. Akari_House
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Somewhere near Seattle
Age: 53
|
Quote:
Okay, YAShiro is probably a stretch, I admit, but I wouldn't put it past Kinz...er, Ryuukishi07.
__________________
|
|
2011-09-11, 09:32 | Link #24335 | ||||||
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
That's because I tend to think at the meta world like at something Toya created, willingly or unwillingly in his mind. The same for me applies for all the meta characters. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
As I said I tend to consider the meta characters as Toya's creations, which means to me Beatrice is also something he mostly made up. After all how many chances to interact with Beatrice Battler might have had on Rokkenjima? He saw her portrait for sure but, apart from this? How much time he spent with Yasu as Beatrice in Rokkenjima Prime and how did Yasu behave? Ep 7 presents a pretty quiet Beatrice when she've to deal with the real world (meeting Kinzo and in the Tea Party). Ep 4 has a slightly more vivacious one, though she lost her vivacity pretty soon. Also, no matter how Beatrice acted in Rokkenjima when and if Battler met her, it's enterely possible he doesn't remember it, or that he doesn't remember it well enough to build his meta Beatrice so he created one that might not even resemble that much in behaviour the original one. So Toya created Meta Beatrice as well as Meta Battler while reading the message bottles, using Meta Beatrice as a representation for 'his enemy/the culprit/the mastermind behind the tragedy/someone who know what had happened'. However we get at Ep 3. Ep 3 was likely built in parallel with the lavoration of Banquet. If banquet was written by him and Ikuko, Ikuko's presence, the mere talking with her, discussing stuffs, likely influenced Toya's meta world and this resulted in him unconsciously changing Meta Beatrice. She's not anymore the sole culprit, she has nice sides, she has something that makes her sad, he can get along with her. In short for me Beatrice as gamemaster in episodes 3-4 is completely a meta-projection of Touya's but, while dealing with her, he gets slowly influenced by an external element, Ikuko. In short I think both your theories work. Toya created her but dealing with Ikuko too had a role in her creation. hum... I fear I've explained it in a horrible manner so if it's too confusing just warn me and I'll try to explain it better. |
||||||
2011-09-11, 10:31 | Link #24336 | ||||||
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
|
Quote:
Quote:
Evidently whoever sold him the island had no idea it sat on a military bases with explosive in... or if he knew agreed in selling it to Kinzo so he could cover up this fact. Accepting he randomly found gold someone unknown accidentally dropped on Rokkenjima might have been part of the agreement. At least... that was my theory but Japanese law might not agree with it. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Damn, I can't really picture if she would risk it or not... Any idea about how Yasu could start working to such a young age and seemed to believe he could drop working for the Ushiromiya at age 13 and live on her own? Because it seemed pretty unbelievable when I read it (though children living on their own is a thing pretty common in manga and anime...) |
||||||
2011-09-11, 10:59 | Link #24337 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
|
Quote:
As far as I'm involved the Beatrices are: - the one Yasu created and that she apparently put to eternal sleep - the one 'revived' by the witch hunters and that live closed in the catbox and that's as good as dead - the Meta Beatrices Toya created and that exist only in his mind (Beatrice the game master, Beatrice the elder, Moe Beatrice) (- yes, we've Beatrice Castiglioni and her daughter too but I assume no one cares about them in this discussion) Sure, it can be argued that if Yasu's body is alive and she's not suffering amnesia the fact that the Beatrice persona is dead is meaningless. However: From Battler's point of view the Yasu he knew when he was a child and Ikuko likely aren't the same persona. It was implied Shannon had changed in those 6 years not only in body but also in behaviour as it was natural. Likely the Rokkenjima incident and the fact that she decided to take another identity changed her further so, as far as Battler is involved the Shannon he loved as a child is dead... and this can be worth sadness, even if he were to fall in love with Ikuko (and I'm not sure if he loves her or they are just friends and partners in work...) From Yasu's point of view she gave up on Beatrice, her behaviour and everything. She started a new life and buried the old one. So again, Beatrice is dead and it can be worth of sadness because a part of her life is gone. Now, I understand your point of view also. Real death should be more dramatic than a persona's death so telling us 'yes, someone died and that's sad but it was just a persona and not a real person' doesn't quite sound right. Umineko however seems to pay more attention to personas than real people so this can cause Umineko's sense of drama to be different from ours without meaning for it to be a bad taste jokes. At least in intention (since I personally go annoyed every time I read Shannon is dead or Kanon is dead when their body is still alive and kicking I understand how seeing Beatrice is dead when her body is actually not could be annoying). In short, I wouldn't put past Ryukishi to show us a dramatic scene in which Beatrice died to merely mean that the Beatrice persona died. Actually I would expect him to do exactly this if he were to depict the death of the Beatrice's persona... though I still understand how it can be annoying... |
|
2011-09-11, 11:02 | Link #24338 |
別にいいけど
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: forever lost inside a logic error
|
You are missing a particular:
That Beatrice is dead and can't possibly be revived. As long as the original persona is still alive, that Beatrice can be revived anytime. Another person can revive Beatrice and in fact Tohya did, but the Beatrice is permanently dead.
__________________
|
2011-09-11, 11:08 | Link #24339 | |
BUY MY BOOK!!!
Join Date: May 2009
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
2011-09-11, 11:41 | Link #24340 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
|
Quote:
I guess Ryukishi meant that the Beatrice Persona can't be revived anymore for (insert random reason here). Basically, missing what Yasu would judge the main condition for Beatrice's existence she can't resurrect her, the same way Maria theoretically couldn't resurrect Sakutaro. To be plausible the condition for Beatrice's existence should be a bit more complex than Sakutaro's since, once Ange provided another vessel, Sakutaro was revived. I'm not saying it's right or fair toward the readers just that is what Umineko had done over and over. I've gotten so used to it not only I woudln't be surprised in the slightest if this were officially confirmed as true but I'm willing to bet on it. |
|
|
|