2015-12-21, 14:25 | Link #303 |
Gamilas Falls
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Republic of California
Age: 46
|
I did like that they kept the structure of the film consistent with the previous six. It starts with Lucasfilm and does have any credits in the start. The Disney and Bad Robot stuff were at the end.
__________________
|
2015-12-21, 15:25 | Link #304 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: classified
|
Quote:
I find that it is sad that so many people in Hollywood just cobble garbage (in storyline) together these days and the public gobbles it up, but I guess companies like WalMart and McDonalds wouldn't be so popular if people valued quality anymore. People's lack of seeing how bad this screen play was should not be a surprise I suppose. Star Wars is definitely the fast-food of film. This gent got much of what I see as wrong with this film across quite well, though I don't agree with him entirely on all points: Spoiler for SPOILER ALERT, Don't watch if you have not seen the movie.:
__________________
|
|
2015-12-21, 15:47 | Link #306 | |
Crazy Devout Fanboy
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: 1st Ra Cailum-class battleship Ra Cailum, port-side officer's bunks
|
I was trying to avoid all the whining and complaining going on here, but it's hard.
Quote:
While there are movies that fall under this description, there are a great many that don't and are still labeled as such anyway by whiners looking for things to complain about. And basically saying that anybody who doesn't agree with you doesn't understand or value quality anymore does not help your argument. You're essentially just saying "I'm right, and you're all stupid for disagreeing with me." Since when did Star Wars ever pull sexist crap like this?
__________________
|
|
2015-12-21, 16:04 | Link #307 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: classified
|
Quote:
There is observation of serious flaws in this script. It's weak to say the least, and many have pointed this out. The die-hard fanboys cannot handle this and are trying to defend this to the death with all manner of excuses which only adds to the fact that the storyline is terrible. To put it in perspective, this storyline is on par with Battle Beyond the Stars, a Roger Corman film. As for criteria as to what makes for a great Science Fiction story, the only work that goes into depth on it from an academic standpoint is James Gunns' seven volume treatise "The Road to Science Fiction." So yes, anyone who has read that treatise has a really good idea of what is and is not, quality SF. This story is obviously junk-food that using Professor Gunn's criteria barely qualifies as Future Fantasy (it's more like a Disney Fairy Tale) and does not even come close to being actual science fiction in the literary sense of the term.
__________________
|
|
2015-12-21, 16:35 | Link #309 |
Gamilas Falls
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Republic of California
Age: 46
|
Star Wars had always been Fantasy. That was straight from George Lucas in 1977. It never really tried to be Science Fiction in the traditional sense. It was Fantasy mixed with 1930s serials in style and it hasn't really changed in 2015 from that style.
Abrams is not directing the other two films.
__________________
|
2015-12-21, 16:46 | Link #310 | |
Crazy Devout Fanboy
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: 1st Ra Cailum-class battleship Ra Cailum, port-side officer's bunks
|
Quote:
I'm saying Star Wars has never been sexist like "I can't believe a girl beat me!" before, so why are you expecting to get it from Kylo Ren for losing to Rey?
__________________
|
|
2015-12-21, 17:30 | Link #311 |
Gamilas Falls
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Republic of California
Age: 46
|
I liked this film. It wasn't overly amazing, but it kept me amused. There were a few things I wanted to know more about that were skipped. There were times I wanted the story to slow down for a second to catch the audience up on things, but it mostly wasn't needed. The story I suppose treated the audience like they didn't need to explain everything to them.
The only problem I had with the story was the "space is small...you can see other planets easily from light years away" problem that happens from time to time, when in reality, you'd might never see such things happen, or if you do, it will be years later. That was artistic license I guess, like that ships make sound in space and have to bank like airplanes to turn.
__________________
|
2015-12-21, 21:07 | Link #315 |
#1 Akashiya Moka Fan
Author
|
Having seen the movie today... well, I was already spoiled ahead of time, and that turned out to be a good thing. My original rating was going to be at least a 9/10, but after reading everything it went down to a 7/10. And when I actually saw the film... my expectations were met. I won't say it was a bad film, but so much of the stuff tried to be like A New Hope, and just didn't measure up. Although to be fair, Disney is damn well milking the fact that it's part of a trilogy and not a stand-alone, which is what A New Hope originally was.
Spoiler for More in depth, with spoilers:
__________________
|
2015-12-21, 21:33 | Link #316 | ||
WE ARE.... PENN STATE....
|
Quote:
There's a big difference between a cliff-hanger (will she be saved?) or open-to-interpretation event (are they going to live happily ever after?) or misdirection (is he actually dying?)... and lazy storytelling. Quote:
The script explains away the seeing of the beams (sort of) but saying that the weapon is a hyper-light weapon (traveling faster than the speed of light, like hyperdrive-equipped ships). Weak, but... I'll accept it. I've accepted weaker arguments in my 20+ years of Star Wars fandom from the movies and non-movie media. I had much bigger problems with a great many other things in the movie, leading to my 5/10 (rounded up) rating.
__________________
|
||
2015-12-21, 22:19 | Link #317 |
mono no aware
Join Date: Jun 2014
|
Initial impressions: an intensley fun film that is bogged down by a handful of problems.
The OT was good (sometimes too good) at efficient storytelling. A New Hope was aggressively plot focused and left little breathing room for character/emotion. It still suceeded as a simple, slick-paced space adventure. The Force Awakens is an intelligently paced film but has superfluous plot elements (Ranthars? Anakins' lightsaber) and characters (Phasma and Orange Yoda). That said, it does cover more ground than it needs to - specifically Rey's development, destroying superduper deathstar (I'd rather the resistance merely crippled it) and finding Luke (abruptly thanks to D2). Technically the movie looked mostly great, but I can't fathom why a practical effects heavy film would showoff two lame CGI characters that take you out of the experience. And a jarring marvel-esk ranthar tenticle scene as I mentioned before. Rey is a touch too perfect, but she's far from bland. Finn's a breath of fresh air, Poe and BB-8 a blast too. Harrison brought his A-game humor as did the stormtroopers. Kylo Ren is deceptively trite but has a lot of depth. The last shot was awkwardly tacked on, but I anticipate we will see the characters a few years in to their adventure a la Empire Strikes Back. Happy to see Star Wars heading back to its roots. Hopefully VIII will explore more new ideas than we got in this solid reintroduction. |
2015-12-22, 00:18 | Link #319 |
Udon-YAAAAAAAA
Join Date: Jan 2008
Age: 35
|
kylo ren is amazing. such a complex and conflicted character. and i doubt he'll flip out at losing to Rey because she's a girl. he'll flip out because he's a descendent of Vader who got out-forced by someone who has no formal training.
plus they're obviously setting Rey up for bigger and better things in terms of family relations.
__________________
|
2015-12-22, 04:08 | Link #320 | |
Did someone call a doctor
Join Date: Apr 2007
Age: 41
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
|
|