2020-03-10, 23:26 | Link #201 |
#1 Akashiya Moka Fan
Author
|
Actually, I just realized... Trump's STILL going to get all the media attention. Maybe this is tinfoil hate time but... Trump makes the media money with all the outrage generated. If Bernie had become the candidate, he'd not only probably beat Trump, but also cause re-distribution of tons of money, which the billionaires and corporations can't have. Which is why they had to eliminate him first. So Biden has basically primary'd Bernie, meaning that now the media can focus back on Trump and making money.
I'm holding out the barest glimmer of hope for my home country but... I now weep for the America that I grew up in and is about to be completely lost.
__________________
|
2020-03-11, 01:02 | Link #202 |
Seishu's Ace
Author
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Kyoto, Japan
|
So your argument is that Sanders can't beat HRC or Biden by getting Democrats to vote for him, but he'd "probably beat Trump" by getting- who, exactly to vote for him? Republicans? Closet socialists?
Face facts - the guy just isn't that popular. He's losing elections because other people are getting more votes, not because of some deep state conspiracy. Social media is an echo chamber, but it's not the real world. And unfortunately for Sanders even people who don't praise Dear Leader on twitter have their votes counted. As for this idea that "the only difference between Trump and Biden (or HRC for that matter) is the letter next to their name" - seriously, read a damn history book. Get out more. Whatever you may think of Biden and Sanders the mere suggestion is offensive and asinine.
__________________
|
2020-03-11, 01:22 | Link #203 |
#1 Akashiya Moka Fan
Author
|
So I'm fully convinced the only reason why Sanders lost to Biden is because DNC propaganda... specifically because as much as I hate to admit it, the ones who turned out are the older people who watch TV. Guess what TV propaganda was being pushed? Always Biden, never Sanders. If anything positive about Bernie had been on TV, he would've won. And I do fully believe that Sanders would've won in the general- this was Democrats only, and I know that Republicans have been swayed to vote for Bernie. Now that's he probably done... they're going back to Trump.
And I stand by my statement that Biden and Trump are the same except for the letter next to their name. See the chart from several pages back:
__________________
|
2020-03-11, 01:40 | Link #204 |
He Who Games
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: the virtual world
|
What beat bernie wasn't biden, it was the dnc and corporate media. If you think biden could have made this comeback on his own, you are ignoring reality. If the repubs had coalesced against trump in 2016 the way the Democrats coalasced against bernie now, trump wouldn't have become president either. And how can biden hope to maintain support when he literally tells people to vote for trump when they dare question, rightfully, his policies and history? Holy crap, at least trump comes up with some BS to deflect blame from himself. With biden , he gets super defensive and angry, literally telling much needed, key voters to screw themselves. Biden's worse enemy isnt trump or sanders, it's himself. Only two things can get him elected: a recession, and obama as vp. And you know what? While sanders could not win their support for himself, he did win support for his platform from the states biden won. The voters who voted for biden also showed massive support for the policies and platform bernie advocates for. Yet, how does biden plan to maintain that support when he tells them he's going to veto M4A if it ever got passed by congress?
|
2020-03-11, 04:12 | Link #205 |
Seishu's Ace
Author
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Kyoto, Japan
|
AOC weighs in with a take sharply contrasting with most Sanders supporters online:
https://twitter.com/julito77/status/1237561195147583489 For those who say there's no difference between Biden and Trump except a letter next to their name, a question - whose administration would you trust more when it comes to handling a public health crisis (like, say, COVID-19)?
__________________
|
2020-03-11, 04:36 | Link #206 |
He Who Games
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: the virtual world
|
Anyone is more trustable than trump. That's not a high bar. What exactly was the point of the tweet thread? That we vote biden no matter what? Forgive us if we feel less than enthusiastic when his main selling point is that he's not trump. We become even less invigorated to vote when he tells us to go screw ourselves and vote trump if we dare to question his policies and platform.
|
2020-03-11, 04:37 | Link #207 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Germany
|
Quote:
Can an ex-president become a vice president later on? Is that even allowed?
__________________
|
|
2020-03-11, 04:44 | Link #209 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Germany
|
But would Americans want to see Obama as a VP? I mean, I can see the other way around rising from VP to future President like Biden tries to do now, but it seems kinda "weird" that an ex-President would want to be a VP after already being President.
__________________
|
2020-03-11, 04:47 | Link #210 |
Seishu's Ace
Author
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Kyoto, Japan
|
Not if they've already served the constitutionally limited two elected terms in office. A vice-president can't be ineligible for the presidency, for obvious reasons. So no, Obama (who'd never be interested anyway) is ineligible. But, as an example, Jimmy Carter would not be (and in fact, Ronald Reagan very nearly put ex-president Gerald Ford on the ticket in 1980 before talks fell through and he settled on George H.W. Bush).
__________________
|
2020-03-11, 04:50 | Link #211 |
He Who Games
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: the virtual world
|
Honestly, biden will need all the damn help he can get if he becomes the democrat nominee. And even if he did win, I don't think he'll last very long, so obama steps in to become acting president. For obama, he has the chance to undo the damage to his legacy.
|
2020-03-11, 05:11 | Link #214 | |||
Seishu's Ace
Author
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Kyoto, Japan
|
Quote:
22nd Amendment: Quote:
A crackpot theory does exist that the language offers a loophole because of the word "elected". But the 12th Amendment precludes that: Quote:
But again - Obama would never do it anyway so it's a moot point. But given his age, Bidens certainly going to be under a lot of pressure to pick a "ready from day one" type of person, who will almost certainly be a woman.
__________________
|
|||
2020-03-11, 05:50 | Link #216 |
Seishu's Ace
Author
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Kyoto, Japan
|
I like Abrams a lot, but she doesn't necessarily check the experience box as well as you'd like for a candidate almost 80 years old. Selfishly I'd love it to be Warren, but she's 70 herself - that might be a problem for some. Harris seems to make a lot of sense in purely electoral terms and while I'm not a huge fan, I could live with it. But there are other women who make a lot of sense - Tammy Duckworth for example, or my personal favorite sleeper candidate Catherine Cortez Masto.
__________________
|
2020-03-11, 07:36 | Link #219 |
AS Oji-kun
Join Date: Nov 2006
Age: 74
|
Biden could pick the "other" Obama as a VP, which would nearly guarantee his election, but I doubt Michelle would take the job. Catherine Cortez Masto is an interesting pick, though she has little public recognition. But then, many VP choices were largely unknown to the public like Tim Kaine, Sarah Palin, and Dan Quayle. I wish governors had more public visibility since I'd much prefer them as presidential candidates than senators.
__________________
|
2020-03-11, 08:36 | Link #220 | |
Seishu's Ace
Author
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Kyoto, Japan
|
Quote:
Of course Michelle is going to be a fashionable fantasy league pick, but it'll never happen. I don't personally think Masto's relatively low profile is a problem - she's a sitting U.S. Senator, Hispanic, and relatively well-placed to be acceptable to both major wings of the party. I still think Harris is the favorite and Warren can't be written off, but Masto would be my 3rd betting favorite. I think Biden loves Abrams and would love to pick her, but the experience factor is a huge hurdle.
__________________
|
|
|
|