![]() |
Link #2202 | |
Mystery buff
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Gone Fishin!
|
Quote:
For example The hidden mansion on the back side of Rokkenjima is one of those occult like things. So yeah a survivor and "hidden survivor" your not supposed to know about would make sense in that context. As well as with the idea that you need two people to create a world. Ange rebuked that idea saying it was a lie though.
__________________
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
Link #2204 | |
Mystery buff
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Gone Fishin!
|
Quote:
Damn we really need a thread for that Episode and fast.
__________________
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
Link #2207 | |
The Death!
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Purgatorio
|
Quote:
I doubt two survivors can happen, you'd get a 10 little cowboys-like scenario near the end I'd probably imagine. I think that's why the married couples are almost always split up in the middle of the murders so it's impossible for a team up. It probably has to be a group of people with the least amount of fatalities possible for a survival. If for instance both Eva and Natsuhi survived to the end of the game, you can probably imagine what would happen. Some people snap near the end of the games, Eva is a prime example of this happening.
__________________
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
Link #2208 | |
Dea ex Kakera
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Sea of Fragments
|
The whole structure of the game, down to the terminology used, makes it seem like a kind of role-playing game. The players can direct their own pieces and narrate about themselves to an extent, but it's the game master who determines what they see, because she's the one who knows what's actually going on.
In that kind of world, it's fine if a player narrates about her own imagination or lies about things, but she can't, say, kill off an NPC without the GM's involvement. It had the air of something that applied to the first four games due to the context, but of course I can't really prove that. Quote:
__________________
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
Link #2210 | |
BUY MY BOOK!!!
Join Date: May 2009
|
Quote:
If the GM even is writing the story, which is another wholly suspect construction.
__________________
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
Link #2211 |
別にいいけど
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: forever lost inside a logic error
|
The facts that the GM in EP6 clearly shows to be totally unaware of the fact Erika killed 5 people and later shows to be quite surprised when he learns that are evidences that can't be put in discussion.
The idea that he was merely faking it is an interpretation. And even if he knew and was faking it, it still wouldn't mean that it's impossible to kill an NPC without the GM knowing, it could be possible that he noticed in another way. If your position is that it's flat out impossible, then you also need to explain why Erika and Bern were apparently so sure that such a thing was possible.
__________________
|
![]() |
![]() |
Link #2212 |
BUY MY BOOK!!!
Join Date: May 2009
|
I'm not saying it's impossible, I'm just saying it may or may not be possible to fool the GM depending on what the GM's actual powers are. Powers which have never been firmly nailed down and which are clearly not all known (or at least remembered) by Lambda and Bern, as they appear quite surprised by the gold text in ep5 and have to check whether it's actually possible for Battler to do it.
If Lambda and Bern were surprised by a power the GM had, it follows logically that they may not be aware of all the powers the GM has. Especially considering that Lambda seemed a bit surprised by the gold when she was GMing at the time. It is simply possible that one can be the GM and not know what powers one has. So perhaps Lambda and Bern don't believe the GM can see everything going on, and Battler does nothing to contradict it (whether he himself is aware of any such power or not and exercises it or not), but that doesn't really mean Beatrice didn't have that power and I think any coherent reading of ep1-4 suggests she does (or is very good at keeping tabs somehow).
__________________
|
![]() |
![]() |
Link #2213 |
別にいいけど
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: forever lost inside a logic error
|
Wait a sec. Lambda is surprised by the gold? She was surprised that Battler could use it, but certainly she wasn't surprised of its existence. Everything suggests she knows perfectly what the gold truth is. Not only that, but Dlanor herself quite apparently knows what's the gold truth.
As for Beatrice, she never had to deal with a player actively controlling his piece like Erika. Anyway I said from the beginning that you are free to have your own interpretation. But when you expose your interpretation you should make clear that it's your interpretation and not something that has been shown clearly in the story.
__________________
|
![]() |
![]() |
Link #2214 |
BUY MY BOOK!!!
Join Date: May 2009
|
Neither has your interpretation been confirmed. There is literally nothing that says what the GM can and cannot do except powers brought up in isolation and general insinuations about how they must conduct business. There appears to be no coherent pattern to who knows about individual elements of the GM's power and there are no less than a half-dozen meta-individuals who have ulterior motives that might color their decision to reveal what they know about a particular power.
I think people have way too much faith in Bernkastel's infallibility or something, to the point that no character can ever seem to do anything that she can't counter (even though Lambda is clearly hiding things from her and has pulled a few fast ones on her since Chiru started). You'd think by this point in the story everyone would be trying to get around her notice through trickery rather than just playing right into it, but that's essentially the undercurrent I've been sensing since about ep4.
__________________
|
![]() |
![]() |
Link #2215 |
別にいいけど
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: forever lost inside a logic error
|
Mine is not an interpretation is simply an establishment of the evidences.
If you go by that logic coherently you should even claim that the fact that Beatrice loves Battler is just an interpretation. Sorry but I don't think so. It is possible that many things int his story are just illusions, but the burden to prove something is an illusion lies on you, I have no need to prove that something is exactly how it appears to be.
__________________
|
![]() |
![]() |
Link #2216 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
|
Remember what Lambda just before Battler used the gold truth? Bern said "it's impossibile, it can't be done!"
Then Lambda said "with red and blue.. right?" and SMILED. Lambda was pretty aware of the existance of the Gold, she was simply stunned to see that Battler achieved the game master level. She was always pretty sure that Battler was an idiot, and seeing him all powered up in such a small time was surely surprising.. |
![]() |
![]() |
Link #2217 | |
Dea ex Kakera
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Sea of Fragments
|
Quote:
EDIT: Whoops, ninja'd by Renall and moh. --- On an unrelated note, here's something of interest: Spoiler for EP6 Beatrice creation monologue:
We've all seen the DID interpretation before, but here's a different one. Doesn't this sound an awful lot like someone creating a character that they're going to write about? In other words, the speaker is going to turn the "legend of Beatrice who plays pranks" into a story character who will live out all of her dreams that she couldn't fulfill in real life. After all, what is writing but giving part of your soul to your characters?
__________________
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
Link #2218 |
別にいいけど
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: forever lost inside a logic error
|
It doesn't make much difference to me. Is it DID or simply a constructed character?
The fact remain that Beatrice is a fictional persona created for the purpose of loving Battler. I would also point out that what's said here about the "soul" is exactly the same thing that Zepar and Furfur say about Kanon and Shannon. In order to create Beatrice this person X had to "split her soul". In the same way Kanon and Shannon are said to do not possess a "whole soul" and therefore one of them needs to die in order for the other to acquire a "full soul" because only a "full soul" is allowed to love. But then when Shannon wins and Zepar and Furfur say that the scattered souls will now merge into one, not only Kanon's soul vanishes, beatrice's as well, and we know that Beatrice is a split soul from that person X. Zepar and Furfur also say that in case Beatrice lost then Shannon and Kanon would merge in her. Notice that Battler, George and Jessica are totally left out. The soul merge only occur between Beatrice Shannon and Kanon.
__________________
|
![]() |
![]() |
Link #2219 |
Mystery buff
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Gone Fishin!
|
I can't remember who, but I think someone said Shannon said in the love trial that if Kanon would have revealed something he could've won and that Shannon was disappointed in him for that. Any idea what that could be?
__________________
|
![]() |
![]() |
Link #2220 | ||
Back off, I'm a scientist
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: In a badly written story.
|
Quote:
In practice, in large scale LARPs which include no emulated characters, this is essentially what happens -- once you have set up a script and it's major branches, you can't change it, because it would require issuing GM fiats to something like 20-30 people out of a hundred. Actually getting the script to go off at all takes a tremendous amount of preparatory work on it's own regardless of who wrote it, you basically don't have time to improvise -- and when you do, someone comes along and swipes the plot out from under everyone anyway. Quote:
By basically becoming a meme.
__________________
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
|
|