2013-02-12, 01:21 | Link #26363 | ||
勇者
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Tesla Leicht Institute
Age: 34
|
Quote:
Seems like it http://www.aljazeera.com/news/asia-p...047642848.html Quote:
__________________
|
||
2013-02-12, 01:26 | Link #26365 | ||
Kurumada's lost child
Join Date: Nov 2003
|
What is really striking to me is to read the user comments on the N Korea's nuclear test news:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
|
||
2013-02-12, 02:54 | Link #26367 |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Montreal, QC, Canada
Age: 41
|
With all the recent investments in military hardware, available new equipment and bigger numbers in terms of potential manpower, someone should give South Korea the green light to finish off what's left of the DPRK. I'm just sicked and tired of watching those bastards do their things completely unpunished.
|
2013-02-12, 02:57 | Link #26368 | |
NYAAAAHAAANNNNN~
Join Date: Nov 2007
Age: 35
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
2013-02-12, 03:01 | Link #26369 | |
Banned
|
Quote:
About DRNK? They're retarded children blaming anyone... saying "it's always your fault!!! Na-ah, its your fault." Hope they had a nuclear accident... that will end up killing themselves.... Uhmmmm.... numbers doesn't matter when they're throwing nukes against each other... |
|
2013-02-12, 06:06 | Link #26372 | |
Knight Errant
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Age: 36
|
Quote:
Taking them out would not be a trivial task, South Korea would likely be trashed in the process. Either way, it seems like Kim Junior is turning out little different from his father. |
|
2013-02-12, 07:26 | Link #26373 | |
今宵の虎徹は血に飢えている
Join Date: Jan 2009
|
Quote:
I bet pathetic singapore would not draw as much criticism if suddenly a nuke armed sub appeared out of the shipyard here one day...HAHAHA
__________________
|
|
2013-02-12, 07:37 | Link #26374 | |||
Meh
Join Date: Feb 2008
|
Quote:
Also, unless you're willing to fly over there, pick up a rifle and join the fight, I wouldn't be so quick in calling for other people to die to satisfy your need to punish the DPRK. Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
2013-02-12, 07:46 | Link #26376 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Gensokyo
|
Dont worry eagle i would love too to live in a world where everybody love everybody, unfortunately the very existence of humans make this impossible.
Now there s indeed two ways of seeing this as history showed it. Either you compare it with the Nazi regime and you consider that their armements is a mean to invade others, or you do it Pakistan/india like and considers that this is the sole way to have your sovereignty conserved. Ofc I m not stupid if i were south Korean i would tend for the former. |
2013-02-12, 08:14 | Link #26379 |
Unspecified
Scanlator
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Unspecified
|
If we talking about NK VS SK without any external help from US or China. NK may have superior number in ground force but that thing is useless when you enemy have superior technology in air force. they just become target practice.
It possible for NK to win and conquer SK but chance are less than 1% unleash if they have secret weapon. Not to mention SK have decade of training on how to handle zerg swarm
__________________
|
2013-02-12, 08:31 | Link #26380 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Dai Korai Teikoku
|
Those who think that ROKA is outnumbered is looking at the wrong numbers.
- KPA has a nominal conscription length of 3~5 years, but effectively 10 years. ROKA has the effective conscription length of 2 years. Basically, the only reason KPA has a higher nominal troop number is because of the length of conscription, not effective conscription. - While nominal reserves of KPA is 8,200,000, this includes virtually everyone of "reliable" political background from age 17-49, with most of them knowing only the simplest things and mostly used for logistics and construction (less than 20% are actual combat troops). The ROK Reserve Forces of 2,900,000 is to be a pure infantry fighting force, meaning in effective reserves the ROKA outnumbers the KPA. I don't need to go into the logistical and technological differences, do I? |
Tags |
current affairs, discussion, international |
|
|