2007-07-31, 04:38 | Link #881 | |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Paris (France)
Age: 43
|
Quote:
|
|
2007-07-31, 18:07 | Link #882 | |
King of Hosers
Join Date: Dec 2005
Age: 41
|
Quote:
I've done a mplayer benchmark (with my own win32 builds) and compared to ffdshow, which seemed to show ffdshow being only a few fps slower. But that wasn't under a "lean" OS, so zomg it must be Windows still just slowing apps down for the hell of it. There haven't really been any updates in FFMPEG concerning H.264 optimizations either since the last few which are about 9+ months ago. So I'm fairly sure libavcodec has pretty much been the same slowness compared to CoreAVC it has always been, whether you are on Xubuntu or not. |
|
2007-07-31, 18:35 | Link #883 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
|
This HDTV Hayate no Gotoku from Eclipse is H264 1280x720 with 29.970 FPS and SoftSub it is worse to decode because it is 29.970 FPS and have SoftSub.
6 more FPS need more processing power and SoftSub eat some good amount of processing power. Video with 1280x720 at 23.976 FPS and HardSub I can play it fine on my processor even if I use FFDshow. The problem on Hayate no Gotoku is the 29.970 FPS and the SoftSub. |
2007-07-31, 18:41 | Link #884 | |
makes no files now
Join Date: May 2006
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
2007-07-31, 22:56 | Link #885 | |
Hi
Fansubber
|
Quote:
|
|
2007-08-01, 10:34 | Link #887 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
|
Athlon 3000, 1GB ram here on Ubuntu. The aforementioned Hayate 1280 H268 runs variably well depending on system status... freshly out of a reboot it will run smoothly, but on a normal working environment (beryl, firefoxes, wine+dc++, and a gazillion other stuff), it is on the edge of staggering. (switching to VLC pushes it over the edge in fullscreen mode?)
It's rather a monster consumer of CPU power |
2007-09-08, 12:38 | Link #888 |
Two bit encoder
Fansubber
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Chesterfield, UK
Age: 40
|
I suspect most of you know of this already, but I thought I'd copy pasta the doom9 thread and see what response it gets since it's relevant.
Basically it's Flash player 9, and it supports H.264/AAC/TTXT/MP4 as well as the usual stuff (the MPEG-4 stuff is all I care about here, I'm sure there are other improvements beside these). It seems to support a good amount of profiles, so it's not gimped like Apple's decoders. I hear it's a little on the slow side (no CoreAVC by any means), but other than that, I don't have much to report. Original doom9 thread: http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?t=129134 Flash 9 Installer: http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/flashplayer9/ http://www.adobe.com/shockwave/downl...ShockwaveFlash A nice test: http://somestuff.org/flashAVC/flvplayer.php Probably won't impact fansubbing much, if at all; but it's nice to see H.264 support becoming more widespread, and hopefully it means that web video will soon become less of a blockfest (here's hoping youtube and the like make the change sooner rather than later). I'm a little surprised at what is supported. They claim 3GP timed text which I find strange, and also Main profile AAC (which is nice, but unfortunately no one uses it, or rather there are no good encoders using it).
__________________
|
2007-09-09, 02:06 | Link #890 | |
Two bit encoder
Fansubber
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Chesterfield, UK
Age: 40
|
As far as I know, there aren't any framerate or resolution limitations imposed decoder side; so while you may not want to do so, I would guess it's possible to play HD stuff through it (CPU permitting).
On the other hand, I would expect such limitations to be put into force encoder side, say for example a site like youtube would automatically downscale (and presumably decimate) a video, then encode it. Quote:
Well either way, it's good news for the people already streaming H.264 because it means they no longer have to intentionally gimp their encodes for Quicktime compatability, likewise it means people don't have to install that awful player.
__________________
|
|
2010-03-05, 06:16 | Link #895 | ||
Me at work
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
2010-03-05, 08:05 | Link #896 | ||
Pioneer in Fansub 2.0
Join Date: Aug 2007
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
|
||
2010-03-06, 11:21 | Link #898 | |
Senior Member
Author
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Virginia Tech
|
Quote:
And to hardsub specific sections that need it, such as complex karaoke effects or afx typesetting, or some of the more intense .ass typesetting. Or if a group wanted cleaner support for crappy players, like VLC or something. AKA, there are reasons why hardsubbing can be useful, but most fansubbers are starting to not support the reasons (i.e., "Karaoke effects are stupid" or "VLC is stupid").
__________________
|
|
2010-03-09, 00:27 | Link #900 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Kentucky
Age: 33
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|