2015-10-18, 02:12 | Link #13461 | |
Secret Society BLANKET
Graphic Designer
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: 3 times the passion of normal flamenco
|
Quote:
On the other hand, I don't think it's a particularly greedy move considering you can still buy (well, rent) the emblems and inscriptions using ingame credits.
__________________
|
|
2015-10-18, 02:22 | Link #13462 | |
Japanese Culture Fan
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Planet Earth
Age: 33
|
Quote:
It's probably not an issue if you are consistently dedicated to the game and play premium tanks often, but for someone who just casually logs in once in a blue moon to play (e.g. me), the options are to blow gold, go broke on credits, or gimp your tanks. |
|
2015-10-18, 02:34 | Link #13463 | |
Secret Society BLANKET
Graphic Designer
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: 3 times the passion of normal flamenco
|
Quote:
For min-maxers of course every advantage counts, but if you're already in such a mindset then you're already at the point where your spending doesn't matter anymore since you're dedicated to the game. A casual player on the other hand wouldn't have said mindset, and so can ignore the miniscule bonus that said emblems provide.
__________________
|
|
2015-10-18, 05:15 | Link #13464 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
|
The maximum possible advantage is bordering on buying yourself Brothers in Arms or having a fourth equipment slot for vents. The percentage boost does mean something when it comes down to long reloads.
At the moment specific boosts are linked to specific emblems, meaning that anything you already had might be meaningless (and you'll have to buy new ones), plus everyone will look the same anyway, because who the hell would buy an emblem to boost their radio range? |
2015-10-18, 05:50 | Link #13465 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
|
Quote:
And yes, it also bothers me that I have to replace my emblems and inscriptions for functionality. The Russian 'Forward!' inscription better give me a speed increase, I don't want to replace that with some shitty other text. |
|
2015-10-18, 06:05 | Link #13466 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
|
I rather doubt that they're going to offer free emblem and inscription resets when the system goes live. I'm not going to rebuy anything. Actually, I'm more likely to straight-up leave the game once my premium account runs out.
Speaking of gold, there's also a not-minor bit of discontent brewing on NA about how most of the premium tanks lately have only been available for cash in the store and/or are bundled with a bunch of other extraneous stuff and hardly ever become available for gold in-game. That's entirely designed to get more money from casual players, but makes long-term players pretty angry. |
2015-10-18, 10:17 | Link #13467 |
Senior Member
|
I'm guessing that you don't know that WG scrapped plans to add the chieftain main battle tank (which is a medium tank and not a heavy tank) to the tier 10 lineup to replace the FV4202, and instead the FV4202 is being replaced by the Centurion Action X in patch 10.0 which is a Centurion Mk 7 fitted with a prototype turret.
|
2015-10-18, 11:51 | Link #13468 | |||
Japanese Culture Fan
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Planet Earth
Age: 33
|
Quote:
Can I win against a worse player when using an unbuffed crew? Of course, it happens all the time. But I'm not going to needlessly gimp my tank to be worse than the rest and risk losing out on let's say a reload during shot trading with the same tank, especially in tier 10 where everyone tends to dedicate maxing out their crews and equipment. Quote:
I've had a lot of fun up until now and spent an unreasonable amount of cash on this game, but unlike previous changes this decision regarding emblems is actually going to harm my gameplay in game, which I'd rather avoid. Quote:
First of all, I'm very much aware of the Action X's existence and how it's planned to replace the FV4202 as a tier 10 medium while turning the FV4202 into a tier 8 premium medium tank. Second, the Chieftain was planned and announced by WG to be a heavy to replace the unhistorical FV215b as the tank after the Conqueror. The Chieftain was never announced by WG as a medium or as a replacement for the FV4202. What was scrapped was it being a replacement for the FV215b, which was pulled at the last minute so that they could replace the FV215b with the Super Conqueror spaced armor heavy and possibly move the Chieftain to a new "Chieftain line". Basically they had the brilliant last minute idea that a famous mass-produced MBT that is still in service has too much potential profit to be "wasted" on just replacing a tank that people already have, so why not give it a dedicated new tank line to encourage players to buy gold and free XP past? It doesn't matter if you've already announced to the playerbase for a long while that it's the FV215b replacement, it doesn't matter that they've already been grinding up the Conqueror line for months in order to get the Chieftain, customer trust doesn't mean shit man, gotta min-max those profits instead. The situation with the Chieftain is so infamous that Armored Warfare is mocking it: |
|||
2015-10-18, 13:21 | Link #13469 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
|
Quote:
I mean, sh*t, they had the Chieftain's 3D model ready and were doing their usual authorized leaks thing, they were thisclose to releasing it, and poof, it goes away. If there's any content they're able to make quickly, it's new tanks. Want T-54 prototypes, clones, or cheap knockoffs? WG's got them for you! Did you hear from Cousin Li that back in 1962 his brother's uncle's sister's neighbor's ex-boyfriend welded the top of a Patton onto a Type 59? IT'S REAL! NOW YOU CAN BUY ONE! Meanwhile, the best they can do with maps is release them and then decide two patches later that they actually suck, so we have fewer maps in the game each time, and every time a map is changed it gets flatter and Agent Oranged. They can't upgrade the game engine because Russian PCs are potatos. They can't make a good alternative game mode or get PvE released in any sort of short term. Modders get pissed off and leave because every release comes with unexpected code monkeying. Etc. I should see whether I can still get into my Mechwarrior Online account. |
|
2015-10-23, 04:13 | Link #13471 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
|
I tried out AW for two days and it is horrible. It is just a big copy of WoT but on easy mode. Light and APC are very forgiving that any noob can do good in them if they tried. It is very hard for skilled players to do well in AW because there is no side scraping and angling turret during reload to bounce shots.
|
2015-10-23, 08:19 | Link #13472 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
|
The problem with lights and APCs is people are over penning them because alot of the new players are treating this like wot and going for the biggest pen values. That said they are a little off balance anyway but that's the point of open beta, to solve balance issues
|
2015-10-23, 22:19 | Link #13473 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
|
I have no problem with over pen because i just switch to HE for them. It is the Lights and APC themselves that are too easy to play. Even the tier 1 APC can do insane damage on any tank 2 tiers higher with some distraction. There is minimal risk in flanking any tank because your mods and crew don't get messed up from taking a shot or just get blown up in 1-2 shots. This reminds me of the old OP wolfpacks that WoT had problems with.
|
2015-10-26, 17:02 | Link #13475 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
|
British WoT commercial https://www.facebook.com/WorldOfTank...6834497265377/
|
2015-12-27, 06:07 | Link #13480 |
Moderate Haruhiist
|
That Cromwell B... Now if I didn't already have an actual Cromwell, that would be a buy, right there. :>
Kind of bummed that they didn't re-offer the IS-2 though, or rather, I was away on vacation when it showed up again early December.
__________________
|
Tags |
mmo games, war game, wargaming.net, world of tanks |
|
|