2010-01-04, 06:34 | Link #4882 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: United States of America
Age: 32
|
Quote:
This trick is used by all humans, its known as hypnotism (add the self if you want but the original word for hypnotism, Sammohan in Sanskrit, means to take control of yourself, the subject is but a means to achieve self-control). How else do you think actors manage to act and magicians manage to pull off their tricks before hundred of people with a straight face? |
|
2010-01-04, 09:43 | Link #4885 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Houston
|
Quote:
Quote:
As someone who argues in favor of Shannontrice but hates, hates Shkanon, I massively disagree with this concept and argue that there is quite a bit of evidence in favor of the theory. Some examples like the fact that the two did indeed like each other in the past (Jesus, have you not heard of the pony theory at all?), combined with the fact that it's very heavily implied that Battler's sin was a broken promise towards Beatrice in Episode 5 (something which contradicts your theory) and Shannon's oddities in her death in Episode 1, which there have been tons of arguments over here. |
||
2010-01-04, 09:47 | Link #4886 | ||
Senior Member
|
[QUOTE=Forsaken_Infinity;2852258]Only bring in things that has already been concretely established or at least very strongly hinted at.[quote]
Well you're not exactly following that example when introducing a theory where Battler is the culprit when it was at least established on a plot-basis that Ushiromiya has not commited murder and that he is the detective in the first 4 games. I know you don't like believing in the relationship between author and reader, but it is not like you implied only about 'the author being nice', it is about the author loosing the trust of his readers if he were to introduce a Logic Error within his own story. If at one point we were to learn what you implied Quote:
And as far as I remember Battler only introduced the possibility of him being the boy from 19 years ago, who has a grudge against Natsuhi, he never shouldered the crime of MURDER with any of his claims. With that he only gives power to Natsuhi's alibi, he does not brandish himself the culprit. The culprit is very well possible to be the univited guest, the '18th person', Spoiler for Episode 6:
Quote:
Every theory has it rights, but only as long as it doesn't contradict the natural flow of a work of fiction...following that thought, of course, even the author can be wrong and there are few genre where this happens as often as in detective fiction (maybe only in fantasy). Every author can force a story in a frame later on and throw certain plot-elements out of the window in favor of his theory with the claim 'it was there to distract'. But that isn't good writing and especially Episode 6 shows that Ryukishi's aim is above many things, to challenge us but also to make it solvable. And don't forget the one thing that keeps reappearing and is the key to many mysteries: Spoiler for Episode 6:
__________________
|
||
2010-01-04, 11:51 | Link #4887 |
Storyteller
Join Date: Aug 2009
|
I remembered the previous interview with Ryukishi and he said this:
Spoiler for interview:
Did anyone notice what a red text that could've been this hint? As far as I remember most reds in this Ep were confirmations about the closed room mystery. Maybe this has something to do with the person count at the end? It's certainly something that was never discussed after Beato said that there are no more than 17 people on the island.
__________________
|
2010-01-04, 12:46 | Link #4888 |
Starcraft Wizard
Join Date: Jun 2008
Age: 34
|
Ach, I can't believe I didn't realize Shkanon earlier. Going back and reading over previous episodes, Battler never sees them both together. Battler never sees both of their corpses (he never sees Kanon's corpse period). There's no way 07 is doing this by accident.
Also this makes Shkanon dressing up as Beatrice is pretty much guaranteed. In the first game it is impossible for the person in the witch costume who shoots Natsuhi to be anyone other than Shkanon. I'm looking forward to future episodes, because they'll come up with an explanation for this madness other than EVERYONE IS CRAZY LOL. The Kinzo being dead and that fact being hidden from people was explained pretty elegantly in episode five. Really hoping to get an explanation for George and Jessica not realizing the truth as one besides "they're dumb lol." Perhaps one of them knowing, but working with Shkanon to hide it? Maybe George is in to traps or something? Which would explain why his relationship with Shannon has more of a forbidden air to it than Jessica's relationship. |
2010-01-04, 13:15 | Link #4889 | |
The unlucky one
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Hiding
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
2010-01-04, 13:30 | Link #4891 | ||||
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: United States of America
Age: 32
|
Quote:
Spoiler:
I don't see how I am thinking like Erika by assuming that anything not stated in red is not trustworthy, its a basic premise of the game. I am willing to take heavily hinted stuff into account and I have the knowledge of all the games so far, Erika was on the island for two days. And yes, the game itself already proved that anything not declared in red is to be suspected through Kinzo's death, the urges from ryuukishi07 in episode 5 is for the reader to not give up and to trust that he will bring everything together. Furthermore, Battler's monologue at the start of the ura tea party was for people to think things through with as many perspectives as possible. I am not so conceited as to claim that only one theory I claimed is the only truth, a major difference from Erika. And unlike Erika, I formed my theories using circumstantial evidence from scenes without red truths. The catch however is that any theory made will be knocked down if it fails against the red. That automatically requires a theory to not fall prey to any red and so far, that's the only concrete qualification of a correct theory, therefore, any theory that doesn't violate any red truth so far is, for now, plausible. The rest of your ideas about Episode 5 are merely your feelings and your interpretation. Trust me on this one, they will be crushed Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Spoiler for wtfax battle xD:
You see, Battler clearly brandishes himself culprit, the battle quickly moves into his alibi and how he could have committed the crime with Erika keeping close watch over him. Furthermore, why would Virgilia not declare "You, the one Ushiromiya Battler I am talking to isn't the culprit" instead of saying "Battler-kun isn't the culprit" if her purpose was to prove Battler's innocence? You see, the hint is clearly there that her red doesn't apply to the Battler she is talking to, whether you see it or not depends on you. Its not a logic error, and its not a lie, its been clearly hinted at and even circumstantially proved already, its simply that it didn't go by your notions of trust or whatever. Not ryuukishi07's problem, if and when he will give the answer, he will have to annihilate lots of such notions anyway. |
||||
2010-01-04, 13:33 | Link #4892 | |||
Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
|
Quote:
Quote:
Spoiler for space:
Quote:
If Kanon = Shannon is not true, then it could also be Kanon alone. |
|||
2010-01-04, 13:37 | Link #4893 | |
Starcraft Wizard
Join Date: Jun 2008
Age: 34
|
Quote:
Seems like due to episode one, the first implies the second to me. |
|
2010-01-04, 13:37 | Link #4894 | ||
Kupo
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Sleeping
Age: 32
|
Quote:
These are all pretty strong clues, and none of them imply or require Shkanon. Only if you want to believe in Shkanon can you pull some of those clues over. Quote:
Spoiler for EP6:
__________________
|
||
2010-01-04, 13:42 | Link #4895 | ||
Starcraft Wizard
Join Date: Jun 2008
Age: 34
|
the_rogue: from what I hear, if you're going to doubt Shanon = Kanon then there's a bunch of closed room puzzles you have to solve, the central one being "how did Battler escape." If you can read Japanese (I don't) you should definitely take a shot at those, it would strengthen your position.
Quote:
What are the clues that would lead us to believe that Eva faked her death? In addition to this, the detective, Battler, declared Eva to be dead. Saying that this was too cruel to George. For Battler to have confused a living person and a dead person, a clue is required to have been presented pointing to that fact. Quote:
Also: Knox's 8th. It is forbidden for the case to be resolved with clues that are not presented! Do you have any clues, any evidence, that indicate that a duplicate was made of Jessica's key? Last edited by scwizard; 2010-01-04 at 13:55. |
||
2010-01-04, 13:52 | Link #4896 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: United States of America
Age: 32
|
Quote:
Quote:
That's what the general assumption at the moment is but that's not the case because in the interview, the question is clearly "What was red truth that was supposed to be in Ep3 but excluded then and included in Ep5?" Erika wasn't there in Ep3, which clearly means that the red truth in question has nothing to do with her. First off, Knox's rules don't apply to Ep 1. Second off, he already gave the hint that there was a magic circle drawn in the door in practically no time. Add in the fact that Battler didn't personally confirm the death (he didn't even see the corpse of Hideyoshi), there are ample clues that Eva(or Hideyoshi) faked their death. Its plausible, however far-fetched it sounds. |
||
2010-01-04, 13:59 | Link #4897 | ||
Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
2010-01-04, 13:59 | Link #4898 | ||||
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Houston
|
Quote:
Quote:
And just because a theory doesn't violate a red truth doesn't mean it's plausible in the slightest. The Natsuhi theory is "plausible." Aliens charging in and killing everyone for the first four episodes are "plausible" (since the Knox rules don't apply to the first four episodes, according to you). Small bombs are plausible. That doesn't mean that they're not pointless and not an utter waste of time. There's a difference between what's plausible and what's logical according to what we've seen, and a theory of Battler being the culprit, which violates every principle of characterization and common sense. Quote:
Quote:
Shannontrice has different evidence from Shkanon, as it in general ignores Kanon in general. Explain this. What does Shkanon have over Shannontrice, as it needlessly complicates the whole murder plot by adding in a ton of people who have to be in on that conspiracy too, and really has nothing on making the plot easier to go by than Shannontrice? Even if there is supposedly more evidence for Shkanon, which I don't believe, extraordinary claims like there is no Kanon and no one knows about this require far more evidence than a simple claim like Shannon killed everyone. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof. |
||||
2010-01-04, 14:00 | Link #4899 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: HK, China
|
Quote:
This scene, when I read it, I was thinking how Jessica strongly disliked being restricted by strict rules and taught sternly as she was supposedly the next head of the family ('s wife). She yearned for freedom and despised the status of head of the family. That's it. To say Jessica developed an alternate personality Beatrice, it is not that simple. Firstly, it was a serious mental illness - DID (dissociative identiy disorder). Jessica did not display any of its core symtoms at all - depersonalization, derealization and psychogenic amnesia. Secondly, usually there has to be some events that causes the disorder, if it is not genetically inherited (no hints of saying the Ushiromiya family as having relatives with mental illnesses). Often the cause is child abuse, but it was said that Jessica did care for her parents and respect them in heart. No hints of her being abused before (no mention of bruise, scars, avoidance of speaking about the abusers). Thirdly, six years ago, Beatrice was rumoured as a witch living in the forest of Rokkenjima before the portraint was hung in the mansion, sneaking around at night to catch people. If Jessica indeed developed a alternative personality Beatrice, it should based largely on this image. However, the Beatrice we knew had a much richer content like being Maria's master, playing innocuous tricks on people with Maria. It was nothing evil and that should not be Jessica's created personality if Beatrice was born because of abuse and stress. All in all, to say either Jessica or Shannon suffers from DID or other serious mental illnesses is groundless and ridiculous (BAD BAD writing, because it conflicted with both Jessica's and Shannon's lively and strong-willed image so much. On the other hand, Kinzo probably fits much better for mental illnesses). They were two healthy ladies, just that Jessica being slightly tomboy and Shannon being shy and timid (at least before she met Beatrice, who gave her the brooch to encourage her to create her own fate. IMO, breaking the shrine's mirror was an act the early Shannon would never dare to do, because she was slightly superstitious and believed in fatalism that a servant like her would never get in love with master George, breaking the mirror was a symbolic act such that she cast away her fatalistic thoughts and started create her own future. A good move proposed by Beatrice.) Last edited by ijriims; 2010-01-04 at 14:10. |
|
2010-01-04, 14:00 | Link #4900 | |
Kupo
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Sleeping
Age: 32
|
Quote:
Spoiler for long:
I agree that I could probably strengthen my position by going back and trying to solve that closed room issue, but it's a doozy to be sure .
__________________
|
|
|
|